FROM MMH

2026–27 ACC Preview: Duke Leads, Notre Dame Is the Sleeper

Duke is Mid-Major Hoops’ pick to win the 2026–27 ACC, but the most interesting part of the race is how many different kinds of contenders sit behind the Blue Devils. Miami can build around proven physical scoring in the frontcourt. Virginia returns a recognizable core with an established first-team All-ACC forward. Louisville has the rim protection and guard talent to challenge anyone if its new combinations become dependable quickly.

Those are different ways to build a title team. Duke’s case is the broadest: established guards, an interior anchor, a defender with size on the perimeter, and freshmen who do not all have to solve difficult jobs immediately. Wisconsin transfer John Blackwell gives Jon Scheyer a proven scorer alongside Caleb Foster and Patrick Ngongba II. Cameron Williams and Joaquim Boumtje Boumtje add substantial freshman upside. The question is whether that depth produces a coherent offense as well as a formidable collection of options.

Miami’s Malik Reneau and Shelton Henderson are among the league’s most difficult frontcourt assignments. Virginia’s Thijs De Ridder combines established ACC production with a central role on a contender, making him MMH’s preseason player-of-the-year choice. Kansas transfer Flory Bidunga can change Louisville’s defense immediately, while Oregon transfer Jackson Shelstad has the creation to make its talented frontcourt more useful. His limited twelve-game season last year makes health a meaningful part of that projection.

The middle is deep enough that a small improvement can produce a large change in the standings. MMH is above the official media poll on NC State and Virginia Tech. Justin Gainey has an experienced frontcourt and returning shooting to work with in Raleigh. Mike Young has returning production around Amani Hansberry and Ben Hammond, plus additions with identifiable roles. Those are stronger arguments than simply counting transfers.

There are substantial coaching changes. Gainey takes over NC State, Michael Malone begins at North Carolina, Gerry McNamara returns to Syracuse, Luke Murray starts at Boston College, and Scott Cross moves to Georgia Tech. They inherit very different circumstances. North Carolina has immediate talent but a new hierarchy to establish; Syracuse has several familiar coaching connections but must translate them into ACC performance. Boston College and Georgia Tech face more extensive construction work.

The negative surprise risk is that recognizable names and recruiting credentials fail to become complementary lineups. MMH is more cautious than the media poll on North Carolina and Florida State. Clemson’s forecast also has to reflect its current injury situation rather than an assumed healthy roster. Zac Foster has suffered another ACL tear, Carter Welling is expected to miss nonconference play, and Dillon Hunter’s eligibility is unresolved. A team’s depth chart must reflect who can reasonably be counted on now.

Notre Dame is MMH’s selected sleeper. The Irish are not a title prediction, but their transfers and returning shooting provide a concrete route to outperforming sixteenth- and seventeenth-place external forecasts. Virginia Tech and Syracuse were the other candidates considered; the supporting research compares all three.

The league has enough credible contenders to pursue multiple NCAA Tournament bids, but postseason selection is a résumé question, not a reward for a conference label. Nonconference wins, road performance, and avoiding damaging losses will matter for the crowded middle. A January run cannot erase every missed opportunity in November.

Each team plays eighteen ACC games. MMH’s projected records total 162 wins and 162 losses, and an outcome-assignment check confirms they are feasible on the official home-and-away matrix. These are independent editorial standings projections, separate from MMH’s automated game model. Rosters and the eligibility assumptions were checked October 29; temporary court rulings and medical availability can still change them.

MMH projected order

MMH RankTeamMMH Projected ACC RecordCoaches’ PollBlue RibbonBart Torvik
1Duke15–3N/A11 (14-4)
2Miami13–5N/A24 (12-6)
3Virginia13–5N/A32 (13-5)
4Louisville12–6N/A43 (13-5)
5NC State11–7N/A75 (11-8)
6Virginia Tech11–7N/A97 (10-8)
7Clemson10–8N/A66 (10-8)
8North Carolina10–8N/A58 (9-10)
9SMU9–9N/A109 (9-9)
10Syracuse9–9N/A1511 (8-10)
11Florida State8–10N/A810 (8-10)
12Notre Dame8–10N/A1713 (8-10)
13Pittsburgh7–11N/A1115 (7-11)
14Stanford7–11N/A1214 (7-11)
15Wake Forest6–12N/A1312 (7-11)
16California5–13N/A1616 (6-12)
17Boston College4–14N/AN/A17 (5-13)
18Georgia Tech4–14N/AN/A18 (5-13)

The ACC’s released preseason poll is a media-panel poll, not a coaches-only vote. The requested Coaches’ Poll column is N/A; the verified media order appears below. Blue Ribbon duplicates Boston College at 14 and 18 and omits Georgia Tech, so both ambiguous entries are N/A. Torvik entries show the ACC order displayed in the supplied screenshot, followed by its conference record; national ranks are retained separately in the research file. NC State’s 11-8 and North Carolina’s 9-10 each total nineteen games in that source. They are reproduced as supplied, not used as MMH’s eighteen-game records. Official ACC poll · Official scheduling format and matchups

Official ACC preseason media poll

Media rankTeam
1Duke
2Virginia
3Louisville
4Miami
5North Carolina
6Clemson
7Florida State
8NC State
9Virginia Tech
10SMU
11Syracuse
12Pittsburgh
13Stanford
14Wake Forest
15California
16Notre Dame
17Boston College
18Georgia Tech

The following rotations are projections, not official depth charts. The first five players are projected starters and the next five are reserves. Statistics are from 2025–26 at the institution in the previous-team column. N/A means unavailable or no prior college season; missing values are never converted to zero. Recruiting identifies original pre-college credentials and the recruiting class. Class labels follow current school rosters and may describe academic year rather than remaining eligibility.

1. Duke — 15–3 ACC

Jon Scheyer has the strongest combination of established guard play, interior defense, and incoming upside in the league. Duke must replace Cameron Boozer’s extraordinary freshman production and Isaiah Evans’ perimeter scoring, but this is not a rebuild that depends entirely on freshmen learning difficult jobs at once. Caleb Foster returns after a season interrupted by a foot injury, Patrick Ngongba II supplies an established interior target, and Dame Sarr gives the perimeter a defender with the size to influence several matchups.

The addition of Wisconsin’s John Blackwell is particularly important. His final 2025–26 line includes 19.1 points and 5.1 rebounds per game, giving Duke a proven scorer who can punish a defense for devoting too much attention to the frontcourt. Foster and Blackwell are MMH’s opening backcourt, with Sarr, Cameron Williams, and Ngongba completing the projected five. Williams is a verified five-star recruit; his length and finishing give the lineup a different dimension without requiring him to run the offense.

The reserves create several ways to adjust. Cayden Boozer is an experienced additional handler, Deron Rippey Jr. offers freshman creation, and Bryson Howard adds wing scoring potential. Belmont transfer Drew Scharnowski can connect possessions through passing and interior efficiency. Joaquim Boumtje Boumtje brings considerable size and long-term upside, although translating international junior production into ACC possessions remains a projection.

Duke’s most important question is offensive spacing when multiple big men share the floor. The defense can cover mistakes, but a championship offense needs its guards to manufacture advantages and its frontcourt to move the ball quickly. The schedule includes two games against Virginia and two against North Carolina, making a runaway league record difficult. Duke remains the pick because its alternatives are unusually strong: a freshman can develop gradually rather than being the only solution to a crucial role.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Caleb Foster · G · Sr. · 6-5Projected starterDuke33 GP • 24.7 MPG • 8.3 PPG • 3.5 RPG • 2.8 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 20 (2023)
John Blackwell · G · Sr. · 6-5Projected starterWisconsin34 GP • 33.7 MPG • 19.1 PPG • 5.1 RPG • 2.3 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 220 (2023)
Dame Sarr · G/F · So. · 6-8Projected starterDuke38 GP • 23.5 MPG • 6.4 PPG • 3.8 RPG • 1.1 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 157 (2025)
Cameron Williams · F · Fr. · 7-0Projected starterSt. Mary’s HS (Ariz.)N/A — no prior college season247Sports No. 4 (2026)
Patrick Ngongba II · C · Jr. · 6-11Projected starterDuke32 GP • 21.9 MPG • 10.1 PPG • 5.8 RPG • 2.0 APGESPN No. 19 (2024)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Deron Rippey Jr. · G · Fr. · 6-3Projected reserveBlair Academy (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 16 (2026)
Cayden Boozer · G · So. · 6-4Projected reserveDuke38 GP • 22.9 MPG • 7.7 PPG • 2.3 RPG • 3.0 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 18 (2025)
Bryson Howard · G · Fr. · 6-4Projected reserveFrisco Heritage (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 28 (2026)
Drew Scharnowski · F · Sr. · 6-10Projected reserveBelmont30 GP • 21.9 MPG • 10.7 PPG • 6.0 RPG • 2.6 APG247Sports 3-star (2023)
Joaquim Boumtje Boumtje · F/C · Fr. · 7-2Projected reserveFC Barcelona (international)N/A — no prior college season247Sports 5-star (2026)

Team profile · Current official roster

2. Miami — 13–5 ACC

Jai Lucas has the pieces to build the league’s most physically imposing offense around the basket. Malik Reneau returns after averaging 18.9 points, and Shelton Henderson provides another powerful scorer who can attack a rotating defense. Those are meaningful anchors after the departure of Tre Donaldson and Ernest Udeh Jr. Miami’s challenge is replacing their organizing and defensive work while preserving the advantages its returning forwards already create.

Acaden Lewis arrives from Villanova with a season of high-level playmaking behind him. He does not have to replicate Donaldson’s game exactly; he has to deliver the ball to the right places, keep the spacing functional, and recognize when the forwards’ presence has created a driving lane. Indiana transfer Nick Dorn adds perimeter size. MMH’s projected five places Lewis and Dorn alongside Henderson, Reneau, and Georgia center Somto Cyril.

That frontcourt can overwhelm opponents physically, but the fit needs attention. Cyril’s value rises when he can finish above the rim and protect it at the other end. Reneau needs room to operate, and Henderson is most dangerous when the defense cannot simply load the paint. Reliable shooting and timely cutting are therefore structural needs, not optional improvements.

The bench offers useful alternatives. Robert Morris transfer DeSean Goode contributes rebounding and finishing, Robert Miller III brings size from LSU, and Marcus Allen returns after an illness-shortened Miami season. Dante Allen gives Lucas another guard, while freshman Caleb Gaskins adds developmental upside. L.J. Cason’s rehabilitation from an ACL injury is not treated as guaranteed production in this active-ten projection.

Reneau’s fifth-season availability is tied to the current eligibility ruling and remains subject to further developments. With him available, Miami has a credible title ceiling. MMH places the Hurricanes second because their proven frontcourt scoring is a stronger foundation than most contenders possess, while recognizing that their spacing and perimeter defense still must justify the confidence.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Acaden Lewis · Guard · So. · 6-2Projected starterVillanovaN/A GP • N/A MPG • N/A PPG • N/A RPG • 5.3 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 35 (2025)
Nick Dorn · Guard · Sr. · 6-7Projected starterIndiana30 GP • 23.3 MPG • 8.1 PPG • 2.3 RPG • 0.3 APGN/A
Shelton Henderson · Forward · So. · 6-6Projected starterMiami35 GP • 31.2 MPG • 13.8 PPG • 4.9 RPG • 2.1 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 19 (2025)
Malik Reneau · Forward · 5th · 6-9Projected starterMiami35 GP • 29.0 MPG • 18.9 PPG • 6.5 RPG • 2.1 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 25 (2022)
Somto Cyril · Center · Jr. · 6-11Projected starterGeorgia33 GP • 21.1 MPG • 9.3 PPG • 5.4 RPG • 0.6 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 46 (2024)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
DeSean Goode · Forward · Jr. · 6-8Projected reserveRobert Morris33 GP • 30.9 MPG • 15.2 PPG • 8.7 RPG • 1.4 APGN/A
Marcus Allen · Forward · Jr. · 6-7Projected reserveMiami8 GP • 18.9 MPG • 5.3 PPG • 3.1 RPG • 1.6 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 74 (2024)
Robert Miller III · Forward · Jr. · 6-10Projected reserveLSU31 GP • 19.3 MPG • 6.1 PPG • 3.9 RPG • N/A APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 66 (2024)
Caleb Gaskins · Forward · Fr. · 6-8Projected reserveChristopher Columbus (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 13 (2026)
Dante Allen · Guard · So. · 6-4Projected reserveMiami30 GP • 23.9 MPG • 6.6 PPG • 2.8 RPG • 2.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 55 (2025)

Team profile · Current official roster

3. Virginia — 13–5 ACC

Ryan Odom has something unusually valuable in this league: a returning core whose players already understand one another’s decisions. Thijs De Ridder is the centerpiece after a first-team All-ACC season. Chance Mallory can organize possessions and pressure the ball, Sam Lewis provides established shooting, and Johann Grünloh gives the defense a genuine rim-protection foundation. Those returning roles make Virginia more predictable than several opponents with similarly impressive names.

Jurian Dixon arrives from UC Irvine after averaging 15.9 points, 3.6 rebounds, and 2.5 assists. He supplies another player who can create a useful shot rather than simply finish a possession. MMH projects Dixon alongside Mallory and Lewis, with De Ridder and Grünloh inside. It is a balanced group: the offense has a primary frontcourt scorer, multiple perimeter options, and a center who can finish without demanding a heavy diet of post touches.

Christian Harmon adds shooting experience from Arkansas State. Kalu Anya comes from Saint Louis after a redshirt season, giving Odom a different physical option in the frontcourt. Elijah Gertrude, Silas Barksdale, and international newcomer Nolan Adekunle provide alternatives, but Virginia should not confuse roster depth with ten players whose ACC roles are already established. Barksdale did not play last season, and Adekunle is making a new competitive transition.

The question at the top of the league is whether Virginia can consistently create enough quality offense against elite size. De Ridder can draw help, but the Cavaliers need to convert the resulting openings without allowing possessions to become static. Their returning defensive framework is a reason to trust the floor; additional perimeter creation is the route to a higher ceiling.

MMH has Miami narrowly ahead, while the official media poll places Virginia second. That difference is small. With home-and-away games against Duke, the Cavaliers have direct opportunities to change the title race rather than depending solely on other results.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Chance Mallory · Guard · So. · 5-10Projected starterVirginia36 GP • N/A MPG • 9.3 PPG • 3.7 RPG • 3.4 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 56 (2025)
Sam Lewis · Guard · Sr. · 6-7Projected starterVirginia36 GP • N/A MPG • 10.6 PPG • 3.6 RPG • N/A APGN/A
Jurian Dixon · Guard · Sr. · 6-4Projected starterUC Irvine35 GP • 30.4 MPG • 15.9 PPG • 3.6 RPG • 2.5 APGN/A
Thijs De Ridder · Forward · So. · 6-9Projected starterVirginia36 GP • N/A MPG • 15.6 PPG • 6.2 RPG • N/A APGN/A
Johann Grünloh · Center · So. · 7-0Projected starterVirginia36 GP • N/A MPG • 7.1 PPG • 5.2 RPG • N/A APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Christian Harmon · Guard · Sr. · 6-6Projected reserveArkansas State32 GP • 27.6 MPG • 12.8 PPG • 3.7 RPG • 2.5 APGN/A
Kalu Anya · Forward · 5th · 6-8Projected reserveSaint LouisN/A — did not play (redshirt/injury)N/A
Elijah Gertrude · Guard · Sr. · 6-4Projected reserveVirginia17 GP • N/A MPG • 1.7 PPG • 0.8 RPG • N/A APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 57 (2023)
Silas Barksdale · Forward · So. · 6-9Projected reserveVirginiaN/A — did not play (redshirt/injury)Rivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 130 (2025)
Nolan Adekunle · Forward · Fr. · 6-7Projected reserveGladiators Trier (international)N/A — no prior college seasonN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

4. Louisville — 12–6 ACC

Pat Kelsey has assembled a roster capable of winning the ACC, although the most attractive parts need to function together before Louisville can claim the top position. Flory Bidunga arrives from Kansas with a final-season average of 13.3 points, 9.0 rebounds, and elite shot-blocking production. He changes the defense immediately and gives the guards a finisher who can turn a modest advantage into a high-percentage shot.

Oregon transfer Jackson Shelstad is the principal backcourt addition. His 2025–26 season was limited to twelve games, so his health and ability to sustain a full workload matter as much as his scoring reputation. Seth Trimble brings another experienced handler and perimeter defender from North Carolina. MMH projects those two with Arkansas transfer Karter Knox, Iowa transfer Álvaro Folgueiras, and Bidunga.

The attraction is variety. Shelstad can create, Trimble can drive and defend, Knox supplies wing size, and Folgueiras can connect the perimeter and interior. The concern is whether the spacing remains convincing when an opponent chooses to help away from a less threatening shooter. Bidunga’s presence is most valuable when the guards can get him moving toward the rim rather than asking him to rescue a stalled possession.

The second group is strong enough to alter the starting projection. Dayton transfer De’Shayne Montgomery adds scoring and defensive activity. Adrian Wooley returns with experience in Kelsey’s system. LJ Wells brings productive forward play from Northern Kentucky, while Gabe Dynes and freshman Obinna Ekezie Jr. offer very different forms of interior size.

Trimble and Wells are fifth-season additions whose availability should continue to be monitored alongside the wider eligibility litigation. MMH’s fourth-place projection assumes the current roster can play. Louisville’s floor is less settled than Virginia’s, but its ceiling is substantial: if the guards stay healthy and the half-court offense develops quickly, the Cardinals have enough rim protection and depth to beat every team above them.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Jackson Shelstad · G · Sr. · 6-1Projected starterOregon12 GP • 34.8 MPG • 15.6 PPG • 2.9 RPG • 4.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 27 (2023)
Seth Trimble · G · 5th · 6-3Projected starterNorth Carolina24 GP • 32.4 MPG • 14.0 PPG • 3.8 RPG • 3.0 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 41 (2022)
Karter Knox · G · Jr. · 6-6Projected starterArkansas22 GP • 22.0 MPG • 8.1 PPG • 4.5 RPG • 1.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 23 (2024)
Álvaro Folgueiras · F · Sr. · 6-10Projected starterIowa37 GP • 20.7 MPG • 8.4 PPG • 3.6 RPG • 2.2 APGN/A
Flory Bidunga · F · Jr. · 6-9Projected starterKansas35 GP • 31.6 MPG • 13.3 PPG • 9.0 RPG • 1.5 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 18 (2024)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
De’Shayne Montgomery · G · Sr. · 6-4Projected reserveDayton36 GP • N/A MPG • 13.4 PPG • 4.0 RPG • 2.1 APGN/A
Adrian Wooley · G · Jr. · 6-4Projected reserveLouisville35 GP • 22.5 MPG • 8.7 PPG • 3.9 RPG • 1.8 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 293 (2024)
LJ Wells · F · 5th · 6-8Projected reserveNorthern Kentucky33 GP • 30.3 MPG • 15.0 PPG • 7.3 RPG • 2.1 APGN/A
Gabe Dynes · C · Sr. · 7-5Projected reserveUSC30 GP • 12.0 MPG • 2.9 PPG • 2.3 RPG • 0.4 APGN/A
Obinna Ekezie Jr. · C · Fr. · 7-2Projected reserveSoutheastern Prep (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 18 (2026)

Team profile · Current official roster

5. NC State — 11–7 ACC

Justin Gainey inherits a program that has changed coaches and personnel, but he does not have to construct every important role from scratch. Paul McNeil Jr. returns after averaging 13.8 points, giving NC State a proven perimeter scorer. Ven-Allen Lubin supplies an experienced interior presence, while UC Irvine transfer Kyle Evans adds rebounding and a clear defensive function. That is the basis for MMH’s optimistic fifth-place projection.

Christian Hammond arrives from Santa Clara to help organize the backcourt. R.J. Keene II, previously at Boise State, offers size and connective play rather than needing the offense built around his scoring. MMH’s projected starting group places Hammond, McNeil, and Keene around Lubin and Evans. The purpose is balance: enough handling to deliver the ball, enough shooting to punish help, and enough interior strength to finish defensive possessions.

Gainey also has options if the initial combination does not provide enough creation. Hofstra transfer Preston Edmead and Maryland transfer Darius Adams can compete for larger guard roles. Jacari Brim brings experience from App State, Eemeli Yalaho arrives from Washington State, and Zymicah Wilkins adds frontcourt depth after redshirting his freshman season. Those players make the bench more than a collection of emergency substitutions, although several are adjusting to a new level of responsibility.

The defense is central to the projection. Gainey’s background suggests a demanding standard, but the players still have to communicate rotations and defend the ball together. Using two interior players can strengthen the glass while increasing the burden on the perimeter to create useful spacing. McNeil’s shooting helps resolve that tension.

Lubin’s fifth-season status remains subject to eligibility developments. Assuming the current roster holds, NC State has enough established production to reach the upper third. The forecast is more aggressive than the media poll’s eighth-place position, reflecting a belief that the frontcourt’s defined jobs can help a new staff establish an identity quickly.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Christian Hammond · G · Sr. · 6-4Projected starterSanta Clara34 GP • 30.3 MPG • 15.6 PPG • 3.0 RPG • 2.5 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 273 (2023)
Paul McNeil Jr. · G · Jr. · 6-6Projected starterNC State34 GP • 28.6 MPG • 13.8 PPG • 3.6 RPG • 0.8 APG247Sports 4-star (2024)
R.J. Keene II · G · Gr. · 6-7Projected starterBoise State31 GP • 22.3 MPG • 2.6 PPG • 4.6 RPG • 1.9 APGN/A
Ven-Allen Lubin · F · Gr. · 6-9Projected starterNC State34 GP • 28.1 MPG • 13.6 PPG • 7.1 RPG • 0.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 69 (2022)
Kyle Evans · F · Gr. · 6-10Projected starterUC Irvine35 GP • 28.7 MPG • 12.0 PPG • 8.7 RPG • 0.9 APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Preston Edmead · G · So. · 6-1Projected reserveHofstra35 GP • 33.9 MPG • 16.1 PPG • 3.5 RPG • 4.4 APGN/A
Darius Adams · G · So. · 6-5Projected reserveMaryland33 GP • 25.5 MPG • 10.8 PPG • 3.4 RPG • 1.6 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 24 (2025)
Jacari Brim · G · So. · 6-2Projected reserveApp State21 GP • N/A MPG • 1.2 PPG • N/A RPG • 0.7 APGN/A
Zymicah Wilkins · F · So. · 6-9Projected reserveNC StateN/A — did not play (redshirt/injury)N/A
Eemeli Yalaho · F · Sr. · 6-8Projected reserveWashington State32 GP • 28.4 MPG • 10.1 PPG • 5.7 RPG • 1.7 APGN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

6. Virginia Tech — 11–7 ACC

Mike Young has a persuasive case for one of the ACC’s largest improvements. Amani Hansberry returns after averaging 14.3 points and 7.4 rebounds, while Ben Hammond’s shooting and decision-making give the backcourt a familiar foundation. Tyler Johnson’s interrupted sophomore season makes a healthier year an important source of potential improvement. Virginia Tech is replacing Neo Avdalas, but it has not lost every player who understands how Young wants the offense to work.

Jaylen Curry arrives from Oklahoma State to provide additional handling and penetration. San Diego State transfer Miles Heide supplies an experienced interior partner for Hansberry. MMH projects Curry, Hammond, Johnson, Hansberry, and Heide as the starting five. The group is built to combine creation, shooting, and enough rebounding to avoid spending entire games recovering from poor defensive possessions.

The bench can change the shape of the offense. Isaiah Elohim comes from FAU with scoring potential, Kuol Atak adds forward size and shooting, and Clemson transfer Butta Johnson provides an experienced guard. Musa Sagnia moves from NC State to offer another interior option. Sin’Cere Jones returns after an injury-shortened first season and gives Young a developmental forward with a different physical profile.

Virginia Tech’s most important question is defensive consistency. Having several players who can make a shot is valuable, but the Hokies must prevent opponents from repeatedly creating comfortable attempts at the other end. Hansberry’s defensive positioning and the guards’ ability to contain the first drive will determine whether the lineup’s versatility becomes a strength or a series of compromises.

MMH’s sixth-place projection is deliberately above the ninth-place media and Blue Ribbon positions. This is a bet on returning production and functional additions, not simply on the number of transfers. Home-and-away games with Virginia and Boston College create very different tests. If the experienced guards remain available, Virginia Tech has a realistic path to the upper half and an NCAA Tournament argument.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Jaylen Curry · G · Sr. · 6-1Projected starterOklahoma State33 GP • 23.7 MPG • 10.1 PPG • 3.2 RPG • 3.5 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 194 (2023)
Ben Hammond · G · Jr. · 5-11Projected starterVirginia Tech32 GP • 31.5 MPG • 13.2 PPG • 2.3 RPG • 3.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 227 (2024)
Tyler Johnson · G · Jr. · 6-5Projected starterVirginia Tech17 GP • 26.1 MPG • 8.0 PPG • 4.5 RPG • 1.6 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 193 (2024)
Amani Hansberry · F · Sr. · 6-8Projected starterVirginia Tech30 GP • 30.8 MPG • 14.3 PPG • 7.4 RPG • 2.4 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 62 (2023)
Miles Heide · F · Sr. · 6-10Projected starterSan Diego State32 GP • 19.0 MPG • 5.6 PPG • 4.5 RPG • N/A APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Isaiah Elohim · G · Jr. · 6-5Projected reserveFAU32 GP • 28.1 MPG • 12.4 PPG • 4.2 RPG • 1.0 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 48 (2024)
Kuol Atak · F · R-So. · 6-9Projected reserveOklahoma24 GP • 12.3 MPG • 7.0 PPG • 1.2 RPG • 0.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 114 (2024)
Butta Johnson · G · 5th · 6-4Projected reserveClemson35 GP • N/A MPG • 6.3 PPG • N/A RPG • N/A APGN/A
Musa Sagnia · C · So. · 6-10Projected reserveNC State34 GP • 12.4 MPG • 2.3 PPG • 2.8 RPG • 0.2 APGN/A
Sin’Cere Jones · F · So. · 6-7Projected reserveVirginia Tech11 GP • 6.7 MPG • 0.6 PPG • 1.4 RPG • 0.0 APGN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

7. Clemson — 10–8 ACC

Brad Brownell’s established program standards remain an asset, but Clemson’s preseason circumstances demand a lower level of certainty than its reputation might suggest. Zac Foster suffered another ACL tear in October, and Carter Welling is expected to miss nonconference play while recovering from his own knee injury. Dillon Hunter’s eligibility remains unresolved. None is counted as a dependable member of this active ten.

That puts more responsibility on Ace Buckner and Notre Dame transfer Cole Certa. Buckner must organize an offense that has lost potential creators before the season begins, while Certa gives the backcourt a shooter opponents must track. TCU transfer Liutauras Lelevicius adds size and another perimeter option. MMH projects that trio with San Francisco transfer David Fuchs and Samford transfer Dylan Faulkner.

Faulkner’s final Samford season produced 17.2 points and 8.6 rebounds per game. His interior work offers a practical starting point for an offense that cannot depend on every young guard being ready immediately. Fuchs provides rebounding and experience, while the larger lineup can create passing and matchup advantages if it keeps the ball moving.

The reserves include Chase Thompson and Trent Steinour, plus freshmen Amare James, Harris Reynolds, and Will Stevens. Reynolds’ responsibilities grow because of Foster’s injury. Their development is essential: Brownell needs enough trustworthy minutes to maintain defensive intensity without asking the same five players to solve every problem. Welling’s possible return is upside, not an assumption built into the projection.

Clemson’s vulnerability is perimeter creation against pressure. An opponent that disrupts Buckner’s first action can force the Tigers into difficult late-clock possessions. The counter is disciplined passing, offensive rebounding, and efficient touches for the big men. MMH places Clemson seventh, slightly below Blue Ribbon and the media poll, because the current availability picture is materially less favorable than a healthy-roster projection. Brownell’s record makes a competitive season credible; the injuries make a top-tier finish harder to guarantee.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Ace Buckner · Guard · Jr. · 6-3Projected starterClemson35 GP • 19.5 MPG • 8.3 PPG • 2.9 RPG • 1.8 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 131 (2024)
Cole Certa · Guard · Jr. · 6-5Projected starterNotre Dame31 GP • 26.8 MPG • 12.8 PPG • 1.7 RPG • 0.8 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 115 (2024)
Liutauras Lelevicius · Guard/Forward · Sr. · 6-9Projected starterTCU34 GP • 23.7 MPG • 8.0 PPG • 3.4 RPG • 0.7 APGN/A
David Fuchs · Forward · Sr. · 6-10Projected starterSan Francisco29 GP • 24.0 MPG • 12.7 PPG • 7.8 RPG • 1.4 APGN/A
Dylan Faulkner · Forward · Sr. · 6-10Projected starterSamford30 GP • 26.1 MPG • 17.2 PPG • 8.6 RPG • 1.8 APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Chase Thompson · Forward · So. · 6-9Projected reserveClemson35 GP • 9.0 MPG • 2.3 PPG • 1.1 RPG • 0.3 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 140 (2025)
Amare James · Guard · Fr. · 6-5Projected reserveWheeler (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonN/A
Harris Reynolds · Guard · Fr. · 6-5Projected reserveSt. Pius X Catholic (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 116 (2026)
Trent Steinour · Forward/Center · So. · 6-11Projected reserveClemson6 GP • 2.5 MPG • 1.0 PPG • 1.2 RPG • 0.0 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 236 (2025)
Will Stevens · Center · Fr. · 6-11Projected reserveDavidson Day (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 154 (2026)

Team profile · Current official roster

8. North Carolina — 10–8 ACC

Michael Malone begins his North Carolina tenure with a roster that can look very different depending on which combinations he trusts. The Tar Heels are replacing the offensive gravity of Caleb Wilson and other major contributors, and a new staff must establish both a playing identity and a dependable hierarchy. There is talent here, but MMH is more cautious than the fifth-place media and Blue Ribbon forecasts.

Utah transfer Terrence Brown gives the backcourt an established scorer. Matt Able arrives from NC State, while Virginia Tech transfer Neo Avdalas offers unusual size and passing for a perimeter player. Jarin Stevenson returns as a forward who can help connect the lineup, and South Dakota transfer Cameron Fens supplies an experienced interior option. Those five form MMH’s initial starting projection.

The Avdalas fit is particularly important. A 6-foot-9 handler can see passes smaller guards cannot, but size alone does not ensure an efficient half-court offense. North Carolina needs the ball to move through him without allowing every possession to become a difficult individual creation. Brown’s scoring and Able’s shooting potential should give Malone ways to vary the point of attack.

Jaydon Young and Buffalo transfer Angelo Brizzi add guard experience. Freshman Maximo Adams is a significant long-term wing addition, while Sayon Keita and Alex Samodurov bring international frontcourt backgrounds. Their prior club production is not presented as NCAA statistics. The different combinations offer upside, but the staff must determine which ones can defend consistently while maintaining spacing.

The defensive questions are as important as the offensive names. North Carolina needs reliable resistance at the rim and communication when a larger perimeter lineup is asked to switch or recover. MMH’s eighth-place projection reflects the time a new coach and an altered roster may need. A good start can move the Tar Heels upward quickly; a list of recruiting credentials is not enough to assume that start.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Terrence Brown · G · Sr. · 6-3Projected starterUtah32 GP • 31.6 MPG • 19.9 PPG • 2.4 RPG • 3.8 APGN/A
Matt Able · G · So. · 6-5Projected starterNC State34 GP • 21.8 MPG • 8.8 PPG • 3.4 RPG • 0.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 26 (2025)
Neo Avdalas · G · So. · 6-9Projected starterVirginia Tech31 GP • 31.6 MPG • 12.1 PPG • 3.1 RPG • 4.5 APGN/A
Jarin Stevenson · F · Sr. · 6-10Projected starterNorth Carolina33 GP • 25.7 MPG • 8.1 PPG • 4.4 RPG • 0.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 21 (2023)
Cameron Fens · C · Gr. · 7-0Projected starterSouth Dakota32 GP • 25.2 MPG • 14.4 PPG • 8.7 RPG • 0.8 APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Jaydon Young · G · Sr. · 6-4Projected reserveNorth Carolina31 GP • 7.5 MPG • 1.8 PPG • 0.9 RPG • 0.4 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 218 (2023)
Angelo Brizzi · G · Gr. · 6-3Projected reserveBuffalo32 GP • 29.8 MPG • 14.5 PPG • 2.8 RPG • 1.8 APGN/A
Maximo Adams · F · Fr. · 6-7Projected reserveHigh school / internationalN/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 29 (2026)
Sayon Keita · C · Fr. · 7-1Projected reserveFC Barcelona (Spain)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 17 (2026)
Alex Samodurov · F · Jr. · 6-11Projected reservePanathinaikos (Greece)N/A — no prior college seasonN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

9. SMU — 9–9 ACC

Andy Enfield has a deep collection of experienced perimeter players, but SMU’s most important work is deciding how their responsibilities fit together. Rowan Brumbaugh arrives from Tulane to organize the offense, David Terrell Jr. comes from North Texas, and Oziyah Sellers reunites with Enfield after a season at St. John’s. That gives the Mustangs more than one plausible creator and shooter, while also creating a real question about which combinations can defend the ball.

Sellers’ October eligibility ruling changes the projection. MMH includes him in the starting five under the current temporary clearance, with the qualification that litigation can change availability. Brumbaugh, Terrell, and Sellers are joined by UConn transfer Jaylin Stewart and returning big man Jaden Toombs. The group has enough experience to develop a functioning half-court offense without assigning every difficult possession to a freshman.

The bench is substantial. Jacob Patrick arrives from Utah, Johan Munch from Oregon State, and Nic Codie from Texas. Nigel Walls returns as another frontcourt option. Gehrig Normand moves from Santa Clara after missing last season through injury, so his return adds a possibility rather than a bankable amount of production. Having several options should help Enfield adapt to opponents; it does not eliminate the need for a stable defensive rotation.

Toombs is particularly important because the guards need an interior partner who can finish their work and make the correct read when help arrives. SMU also needs its forwards to rebound rather than assuming a perimeter scoring advantage will compensate for extra possessions conceded. The ceiling rises if the Mustangs can play quickly without losing their defensive organization.

MMH has SMU ninth, close to the tenth-place media and Blue Ribbon positions. This is a credible upper-half contender with a less settled defensive floor than the teams above it. The two-game series with Louisville is a direct test of whether the Mustangs’ depth can withstand one of the conference’s most demanding frontcourts.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Rowan Brumbaugh · G · Gr. · 6-4Projected starterTulane33 GP • 35.9 MPG • 19.2 PPG • 4.9 RPG • 3.5 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 87 (2022)
David Terrell Jr. · G · Sr. · 6-4Projected starterNorth Texas33 GP • 32.8 MPG • 13.5 PPG • 3.7 RPG • 4.8 APGN/A
Oziyah Sellers · G · Gr. · 6-5Projected starterSt. John’s37 GP • 28.6 MPG • 10.3 PPG • 2.7 RPG • 1.6 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 138 (2022)
Jaylin Stewart · F · Sr. · 6-7Projected starterUConn32 GP • 16.2 MPG • 4.2 PPG • 2.6 RPG • 1.1 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 60 (2023)
Jaden Toombs · F · So. · 6-10Projected starterSMU27 GP • 20.0 MPG • 8.3 PPG • 4.6 RPG • 1.1 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 38 (2025)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Jacob Patrick · G · Sr. · 6-6Projected reserveUtah10 GP • 20.4 MPG • 7.2 PPG • 1.4 RPG • 0.5 APGN/A
Gehrig Normand · G · Sr. · 6-6Projected reserveSanta ClaraN/A — did not play (redshirt/injury)Rivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 82 (2023)
Nic Codie · F · Jr. · 6-8Projected reserveTexas24 GP • 15.9 MPG • 4.1 PPG • 3.1 RPG • 0.8 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 65 (2024)
Johan Munch · F · Jr. · 6-11Projected reserveOregon State31 GP • 21.0 MPG • 7.9 PPG • 5.1 RPG • 1.0 APGN/A
Nigel Walls · F · So. · 6-10Projected reserveSMU9 GP • 3.4 MPG • 0.0 PPG • 0.2 RPG • 0.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 69 (2025)

Team profile · Current official roster

10. Syracuse — 9–9 ACC

Gerry McNamara’s return gives Syracuse an immediate identity and an energized audience, but the basketball argument is stronger than nostalgia alone. McNamara brings familiar players from Siena, adds established creation from other programs, and retains young players who can still develop into meaningful ACC contributors. MMH places the Orange tenth, slightly above their media and Torvik conference positions and more clearly above Blue Ribbon’s fifteenth-place forecast.

Garwey Dual arrives from McNeese to help organize the backcourt. Temple transfer Aiden Tobiason supplies perimeter scoring, while Gavin Doty brings a productive Siena season and familiarity with McNamara’s expectations. Quinnipiac transfer Amarri Monroe adds scoring and rebounding at forward. Tasman Goodrick, another Siena arrival, is the initial interior projection, although his nine-game 2025–26 season means health and workload deserve close attention.

Syracuse also has a plausible route to improvement from its reserves. Kiyan Anthony and Sadiq White Jr. return with a year of college experience. Francis Folefac follows McNamara from Siena, Luke Wilson arrives from App State with defensive and rebounding credentials, and international freshman Abdramane Siby provides another form of interior size. Wilson can challenge for a starting role if his rim protection translates immediately.

The concern is defensive cohesion. Several productive players are taking a step into a more physically demanding league, and familiarity with a coach does not remove every adjustment. Syracuse needs to protect the paint without giving opponents comfortable perimeter shots. On offense, the guards must share creation rather than taking turns trying to reproduce their previous-school scoring totals.

The optimistic case is a team with several usable handlers, an established rebounding forward, and enough interior options to solve different matchups. The cautious case is that the transfers need time and the returning sophomores remain inconsistent. MMH splits those outcomes with a .500 ACC forecast: meaningful progress, a competitive home floor, and a chance to exceed outside expectations without presuming an immediate return to the league’s elite.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Garwey Dual · G · Sr. · 6-5Projected starterMcNeese34 GP • 26.5 MPG • 8.4 PPG • 2.9 RPG • 4.4 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 39 (2023)
Aiden Tobiason · G · Jr. · 6-6Projected starterTemple31 GP • 35.2 MPG • 15.2 PPG • 3.7 RPG • 2.1 APGN/A
Gavin Doty · G · Jr. · 6-5Projected starterSiena35 GP • 36.8 MPG • 18.0 PPG • 6.9 RPG • 2.2 APGN/A
Amarri Monroe · F · 5th · 6-7Projected starterQuinnipiac30 GP • 33.2 MPG • 15.6 PPG • 8.3 RPG • 2.2 APGN/A
Tasman Goodrick · F · Sr. · 6-10Projected starterSiena9 GP • 23.4 MPG • 9.7 PPG • 7.3 RPG • 1.3 APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Kiyan Anthony · G · So. · 6-5Projected reserveSyracuse29 GP • 18.7 MPG • 8.0 PPG • 1.4 RPG • 0.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 33 (2025)
Sadiq White Jr. · F · So. · 6-8Projected reserveSyracuse31 GP • 15.1 MPG • 6.1 PPG • 3.3 RPG • 0.4 APGN/A
Francis Folefac · F · So. · 6-7Projected reserveSiena35 GP • 28.1 MPG • 11.3 PPG • 5.3 RPG • 2.2 APGN/A
Luke Wilson · C · Jr. · 6-10Projected reserveApp State32 GP • N/A MPG • 10.7 PPG • 8.3 RPG • N/A APGN/A
Abdramane Siby · C · Fr. · 7-0Projected reserveMega Superbet (international)N/A — no prior college seasonN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

11. Florida State — 8–10 ACC

Luke Loucks has built a roster with greater variety than a quick glance at Florida State’s returning production would suggest. The Seminoles can put an experienced defender at the point, add size on the wing, and bring several different kinds of interior players into a game. The question is whether that variety becomes a coherent offense quickly enough to match the more optimistic outside forecasts.

Missouri transfer Anthony Robinson II is central to that answer. His defensive activity and experience give Loucks a guard who can set a standard beyond scoring. Freshman Martay Barnes offers another source of creation. UNC Asheville transfer Kam Taylor adds wing production, Colorado transfer Sebastian Rancik provides forward skill, and returning center Alex Steen gives the frontcourt continuity. Steen’s fifth-season eligibility has received a favorable ruling, but the forecast remains conditional on his continued availability.

The reserves are intriguing. Shon Abaev arrives after a freshman season at Cincinnati, while Cooper Schwieger joins from Wake Forest. Freshmen Marcis Ponder, Brandon Bass Jr., and Collin Paul give Loucks size and developmental options. Ponder is a particularly interesting physical addition, but neither his size nor a recruiting ranking guarantees that he will immediately solve ACC defensive possessions.

Florida State needs an offensive hierarchy. Robinson can initiate, Taylor can attack from the wing, and the forwards can provide targets, but the group must determine where a dependable late-clock shot comes from. The defense can make that task easier by creating possessions before an opponent is set. It still needs disciplined rebounding and transition coverage when those opportunities are not available.

MMH’s eleventh-place position is below the media poll’s seventh and Blue Ribbon’s eighth. That is a judgment about immediate fit, not an absence of talent. If Barnes is ready early and the experienced additions settle into clear jobs, the Seminoles can make this forecast look cautious. Until then, a crowded middle of the ACC leaves little margin for an extended adjustment period.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Martay Barnes · G · Fr. · 6-2Projected starterThe Academy of Central Florida (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 91 (2026)
Anthony Robinson II · G · Sr. · 6-3Projected starterMissouri33 GP • N/A MPG • 8.9 PPG • N/A RPG • 3.0 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 144 (2023)
Kam Taylor · G · Jr. · 6-7Projected starterUNC Asheville32 GP • 34.6 MPG • 18.9 PPG • 5.0 RPG • 3.0 APGN/A
Sebastian Rancik · F · Jr. · 6-11Projected starterColorado29 GP • 28.3 MPG • 12.3 PPG • 5.6 RPG • 2.0 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 111 (2024)
Alex Steen · F · 5th · 6-9Projected starterFlorida State32 GP • 19.8 MPG • 6.8 PPG • 5.8 RPG • 0.9 APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Shon Abaev · F · So. · 6-8Projected reserveCincinnati24 GP • N/A MPG • 7.0 PPG • 2.9 RPG • N/A APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 27 (2025)
Cooper Schwieger · F · Sr. · 6-10Projected reserveWake Forest34 GP • 20.3 MPG • 5.1 PPG • 2.5 RPG • 0.9 APGN/A
Marcis Ponder · C · Fr. · 7-0Projected reserveGillion Basketball Academy (Va.) (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 46 (2026)
Brandon Bass Jr. · G · Fr. · 6-5Projected reserveWindermere Preparatory School (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 112 (2026)
Collin Paul · F · Fr. · 6-8Projected reserveCalvary Christian Academy (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 133 (2026)

Team profile · Current official roster

12. Notre Dame — 8–10 ACC

Micah Shrewsberry has lost the kind of names that usually shape a preseason prediction. Markus Burton, Jalen Haralson, and Cole Certa have moved on, leaving Notre Dame without the same obvious individual scoring foundation. That explains why the Irish sit sixteenth in the media poll and seventeenth in Blue Ribbon. MMH sees a more competitive team, while recognizing that a better fit is not automatically a better record.

Gonzaga transfer Braeden Smith is the organizing addition. He joins returning shooter Braeden Shrewsberry and Davidson transfer Devin Brown in MMH’s projected backcourt. Brady Koehler supplies a developing forward, and Winthrop transfer Logan Duncomb gives the offense an interior target. The aim is a lineup whose players can make one another’s jobs easier through spacing, passing, and defined responsibilities.

Duncomb’s arrival is particularly significant. A credible interior scorer can make it more expensive for an opponent to chase Shrewsberry around the perimeter or crowd Smith’s passing lanes. Koehler’s shooting offers another way to keep the floor open, while Brown can contribute without needing every possession to begin with him. The projection depends on those functions surviving against ACC length and pressure.

Logan Imes returns with backcourt experience. Rutgers transfer Bryce Ruglass Dortch adds defensive versatility, Yoro Diallo arrives from Division II UVA Wise, and freshman Jonathan Sanderson provides another perimeter prospect. Tommy Ahneman is a developmental interior option after spending last season rehabilitating a knee injury. None should be assigned an established ACC role simply because a vacancy exists.

Notre Dame’s defensive ceiling and late-clock creation remain concerns. Its guards must protect the ball, the forwards must rebound, and its offense must produce something useful when the initial action is denied. MMH projects twelfth at 8–10 and selects the Irish as the sleeper because the gap to external expectations is meaningful. That is an argument for a more functional team, not a prediction that Notre Dame suddenly belongs in the title conversation.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Braeden Smith · Guard · 5th · 6-0Projected starterGonzaga35 GP • 17.1 MPG • 5.1 PPG • 2.2 RPG • 3.6 APGN/A
Braeden Shrewsberry · Guard · Sr. · 6-4Projected starterNotre Dame31 GP • 32.7 MPG • 11.9 PPG • 3.1 RPG • 1.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 207 (2023)
Devin Brown · Guard · So. · 6-6Projected starterDavidson34 GP • 23.4 MPG • 6.4 PPG • 3.4 RPG • 1.6 APGN/A
Brady Koehler · Forward · So. · 6-10Projected starterNotre Dame30 GP • 16.0 MPG • 5.6 PPG • 3.2 RPG • 0.3 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 78 (2025)
Logan Duncomb · Center · 5th · 6-10Projected starterWinthrop32 GP • 24.3 MPG • 18.3 PPG • 8.9 RPG • 1.6 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 75 (2021)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Logan Imes · Guard · Sr. · 6-4Projected reserveNotre Dame31 GP • 21.1 MPG • 4.7 PPG • 3.2 RPG • 1.7 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 192 (2023)
Bryce Ruglass Dortch · Forward · Jr. · 6-9Projected reserveRutgers31 GP • 14.5 MPG • 2.1 PPG • 3.2 RPG • 0.1 APGN/A
Yoro Diallo · Forward · 5th · 6-9Projected reserveUVA Wise29 GP • 32.3 MPG • 14.5 PPG • 8.0 RPG • 3.3 APGN/A
Jonathan Sanderson · Guard · Fr. · 6-3Projected reserveLa Lumiere (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 85 (2026)
Tommy Ahneman · Center · So. · 6-10Projected reserveNotre DameN/A — did not play (redshirt/injury)Rivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 159 (2025)

Team profile · Current official roster

13. Pittsburgh — 7–11 ACC

Jeff Capel has assembled recognizable ACC experience, but Pittsburgh still has to turn that familiarity into a more dependable team. Naithan George and Baye Ndongo reunite after playing together at Georgia Tech, with George arriving most recently from Syracuse. Their relationship gives the offense a practical starting point: a guard who can deliver the ball and an interior player who knows how to present a target.

George’s playmaking is important because several teammates can benefit from advantages without necessarily creating them consistently. Alabama transfer Jalil Bethea offers scoring upside, Charleston Southern transfer A’lahn Sumler adds another experienced perimeter option, and BYU transfer Dominique Diomande gives Capel a larger forward. MMH projects those four around Ndongo, who finished his Georgia Tech season at 11.8 points and 8.1 rebounds per game.

There are alternatives if that combination lacks shooting or defensive resistance. Jonathan Powell joins from North Carolina, Armani Mighty arrives from Mercer after a productive rebounding season, and Akir Souare provides another interior option after Syracuse. Timofei Rudovskii brings scoring experience from Bryant. Freshman Chase Foster gives the group a wing with developmental upside and a verified national recruiting profile.

The concern is not whether Pittsburgh can assemble five players with college experience. It is whether those five can create efficient offense without leaving the defense vulnerable. George must be able to move opponents rather than simply accumulate passes, and the forwards must give the guards useful space. Ndongo and Mighty offer rebounding, but combinations with multiple interior players may require especially disciplined perimeter shooting and transition defense.

MMH places Pitt thirteenth, below Blue Ribbon’s eleventh and the media poll’s twelfth. The floor should benefit from the amount of experience, while the ceiling depends on a guard or wing becoming a reliable scoring partner for George’s creation. There is enough here to win meaningful ACC games; there is not yet enough certainty to project a return to the upper half.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Naithan George · G · Sr. · 6-4Projected starterSyracuse32 GP • 32.1 MPG • 10.9 PPG • 3.0 RPG • 5.4 APGN/A
Jalil Bethea · G · Jr. · 6-5Projected starterAlabama26 GP • 8.1 MPG • 3.9 PPG • 1.7 RPG • 0.5 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 6 (2024)
A’lahn Sumler · G · 5th · 6-4Projected starterCharleston Southern28 GP • 30.2 MPG • 18.9 PPG • 4.8 RPG • 3.8 APGN/A
Dominique Diomande · F · Jr. · 6-7Projected starterBYU24 GP • 7.2 MPG • 1.9 PPG • 1.3 RPG • N/A APGN/A
Baye Ndongo · F · Sr. · 6-9Projected starterGeorgia Tech27 GP • 27.2 MPG • 11.8 PPG • 8.1 RPG • 2.4 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 170 (2023)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Jonathan Powell · G/F · Jr. · 6-6Projected reserveNorth Carolina33 GP • 16.4 MPG • 4.8 PPG • 2.4 RPG • 0.7 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 137 (2024)
Akir Souare · F · Sr. · 6-11Projected reserveSyracuse29 GP • 8.2 MPG • 0.9 PPG • 1.9 RPG • 0.2 APGN/A
Armani Mighty · C · Sr. · 6-10Projected reserveMercer32 GP • 31.2 MPG • 13.2 PPG • 10.6 RPG • 1.1 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 271 (2022)
Chase Foster · F · Fr. · 6-9Projected reserveHigh school / internationalN/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 43 (2026)
Timofei Rudovskii · F · So. · 6-10Projected reserveBryant31 GP • 31.5 MPG • 12.9 PPG • 4.7 RPG • 1.8 APGN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

14. Stanford — 7–11 ACC

Kyle Smith has a different roster problem from coaches who have filled every opening with an established transfer. Stanford must develop a young core while using a small number of experienced additions to hold the team together. The departure of Ebuka Okorie removes an unusually important offensive player, and replacing his creation requires more than identifying the next player in the scoring column.

Delaware transfer Christian Bliss is the most direct answer. He averaged 16.7 points, 5.2 rebounds, and 5.9 assists last season, giving Stanford a larger guard who can organize and finish possessions. Yale transfer Nick Townsend adds a skilled forward after an Ivy League player-of-the-year season. His temporary eligibility clearance in October is material to the forecast: MMH includes him under that ruling, rather than treating an earlier pending status as current.

MMH projects Bliss with Anthony Batson Jr. and Evan Stinson on the perimeter, Townsend at forward, and Seattle transfer Austin Maurer inside. That is a projection with health-related uncertainty. Batson redshirted last season, while Stinson’s year ended after four games. Returning to the court is not the same as returning with an established high-volume role.

Aidan Cammann supplies experienced frontcourt minutes. Kristers Skrinda returns after an injury-shortened freshman season, while Julius Price, Elias Obenyah, and Drew Anderson bring new perimeter and forward possibilities. Smith’s challenge is giving the freshmen genuine development opportunities without relying on them to solve every scoring drought immediately.

Stanford’s best path is to make Bliss and Townsend’s passing multiply the value of the players around them. Its largest risk is that the supporting cast does not provide enough dependable shooting or defensive stops. MMH projects fourteenth, close to the external middle-to-lower-tier forecasts. Townsend improves the ceiling considerably, but a young team with multiple players returning from limited seasons still has a narrower margin than a list of names suggests.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Christian Bliss · G · Jr. · 6-4Projected starterDelaware31 GP • 39.8 MPG • 16.7 PPG • 5.2 RPG • 5.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 150 (2023)
Anthony Batson Jr. · G · Jr. · 6-3Projected starterStanfordN/A — did not play (redshirt/injury)Rivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 265 (2024)
Evan Stinson · F · Jr. · 6-7Projected starterStanford4 GP • 5.3 MPG • 1.8 PPG • 0.5 RPG • 0.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 255 (2024)
Nick Townsend · F · 5th · 6-7Projected starterYale30 GP • N/A MPG • 16.3 PPG • 7.4 RPG • 4.3 APGN/A
Austin Maurer · C · Jr. · 7-0Projected starterSeattle35 GP • N/A MPG • 7.2 PPG • 4.2 RPG • N/A APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 215 (2024)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Kristers Skrinda · F · So. · 6-10Projected reserveStanford9 GP • 6.0 MPG • 0.8 PPG • 1.6 RPG • 0.1 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 224 (2025)
Julius Price · G · Fr. · 6-3Projected reserveSt. Joseph (Calif., HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 157 (2026)
Elias Obenyah · G · Fr. · 6-5Projected reserveSalesian (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 144 (2026)
Drew Anderson · F · Fr. · 6-9Projected reserveSanta Margarita Catholic (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 145 (2026)
Aidan Cammann · C · Sr. · 6-10Projected reserveStanford33 GP • 21.7 MPG • 6.5 PPG • 3.8 RPG • 1.4 APGN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

15. Wake Forest — 6–12 ACC

Steve Forbes has again used the transfer market to construct a team with defined sources of production. The difficulty is that Wake Forest is replacing an enormous amount of continuity, including Juke Harris’ perimeter scoring. A new guard can reproduce part of a stat line without immediately replacing the attention and decision-making that created it. That distinction keeps MMH’s forecast in the lower half.

Kevair Kennedy arrives from Merrimack after a standout freshman season that included 18.4 points per game. He gives Wake a credible starting point in the backcourt, while Monmouth transfer Justin Ray adds shooting. Kansas transfer Jamari McDowell offers another perimeter option. MMH projects that trio around Northern Colorado transfer Ring Nyeri and Georgia transfer Justin Abson.

The frontcourt has several useful forms of size. Abson brings shot-blocking experience, Nyeri can rebound, and Antonio Dorn moves from Virginia Tech to provide another interior option. Xander Pintelon arrives from FAU. Freshmen Gavin Placide and Gallagher Placide add longer-term forward potential, while Isaac Carr returns as a young guard who can compete for a larger role. The resulting rotation has flexibility, but its best combinations are not yet obvious.

Kennedy’s transition is the key offensive question. Wake needs his creation to remain effective against longer defenders without requiring him to force difficult attempts. Ray’s shooting can open the floor, and the big men must convert the opportunities the guards create. At the other end, the perimeter cannot assume that Abson’s presence will repair every initial breakdown.

Abson’s fifth-season availability remains connected to an eligibility ruling. With him in the lineup, MMH still projects fifteenth, below Blue Ribbon’s thirteenth. That reflects the challenge of assembling a cohesive ACC offense from a collection of new roles. Forbes has enough options to outperform the forecast, particularly if Kennedy translates immediately, but the projection requires evidence of that fit before moving Wake into the crowded middle.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Kevair Kennedy · G · So. · 6-2Projected starterMerrimack34 GP • 36.8 MPG • 18.4 PPG • 4.6 RPG • 4.2 APGN/A
Justin Ray · G · Jr. · 6-2Projected starterMonmouth34 GP • 28.4 MPG • 11.3 PPG • 2.1 RPG • 1.2 APGN/A
Jamari McDowell · G · R-Jr. · 6-5Projected starterKansas35 GP • 17.2 MPG • 3.3 PPG • 1.6 RPG • 1.1 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 97 (2023)
Ring Nyeri · F · Jr. · 6-9Projected starterNorthern Colorado32 GP • 25.8 MPG • 8.5 PPG • 6.3 RPG • 0.6 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 264 (2024)
Justin Abson · F · Gr. · 6-9Projected starterGeorgia31 GP • 11.5 MPG • 2.9 PPG • 3.6 RPG • 0.4 APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Isaac Carr · G · So. · 6-4Projected reserveWake Forest26 GP • 11.2 MPG • 2.2 PPG • 1.7 RPG • 1.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 268 (2025)
Gavin Placide · F · Fr. · 6-11Projected reserveFaith Family Academy (Texas) (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 87 (2026)
Antonio Dorn · C · Jr. · 7-0Projected reserveVirginia Tech24 GP • 8.5 MPG • 2.6 PPG • 1.8 RPG • 0.4 APGN/A
Xander Pintelon · F · Sr. · 6-11Projected reserveFAU33 GP • 18.1 MPG • 6.2 PPG • 3.7 RPG • 0.7 APGN/A
Gallagher Placide · F · Fr. · 6-9Projected reserveFaith Family Academy (Texas) (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 105 (2026)

Team profile · Current official roster

16. California — 5–13 ACC

Mark Madsen has several players who can grow into larger jobs, but California enters with less proven perimeter production than most of the league. The departure of its previous leading scorers leaves a creation problem that cannot be solved by counting incoming players. Cal needs a guard who can bend the defense, reliable shooting around him, and enough interior resistance to keep games manageable while those roles develop.

Jordan Ross arrives from Georgia to help organize the backcourt. Semetri Carr returns with a season of college handling experience, while Jovani Ruff is available after redshirting his first year. MMH projects those three with Sammie Yeanay and Lee Dort. The lineup emphasizes an established interior presence and the possibility of development from younger perimeter players, rather than assuming a single transfer will carry the offense.

The bench offers several different bets. Amier Ali joins from Mississippi State, Jake Wilkins arrives from Georgia, and Michael Cooper brings experience from Wright State. Freshman Gabriel Sularski adds another perimeter prospect. Mantas Kočanas returns with an actual Cal season behind him; his earlier Florida Atlantic stop should not be confused with the institution responsible for his 2025–26 statistics.

Dort’s physical presence is important on both ends. Cal needs him to finish possessions, rebound, and provide enough offense near the basket to discourage opponents from extending pressure freely. The perimeter must then make useful decisions after the first advantage. An offense that repeatedly asks an unproven guard to create a contested shot will place too much pressure on the defense.

MMH projects sixteenth, close to Blue Ribbon and below the media poll’s fifteenth-place position. The ceiling is a more balanced team whose younger players become dependable contributors. The floor is prolonged offensive inconsistency and too many close possessions decided by the opponent’s best scorer. Cal’s route upward is development and collective execution; the current roster does not justify assuming either will arrive immediately.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Jordan Ross · G · Sr. · 6-3Projected starterGeorgia32 GP • 20.9 MPG • 6.7 PPG • 2.5 RPG • 2.3 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 134 (2023)
Semetri (TT) Carr · G · So. · 6-1Projected starterCalifornia32 GP • 16.4 MPG • 3.8 PPG • 2.6 RPG • 2.2 APGN/A
Jovani Ruff · G · R-Fr. · 6-5Projected starterCaliforniaN/A — did not play (redshirt/injury)Rivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 126 (2025)
Sammie Yeanay · F · Jr. · 6-9Projected starterCalifornia9 GP • 4.3 MPG • 1.1 PPG • 1.0 RPG • 0.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 102 (2024)
Lee Dort · F · Gr. · 6-10Projected starterCalifornia27 GP • 23.0 MPG • 8.1 PPG • 7.8 RPG • 0.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 98 (2022)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Amier Ali · G/F · Jr. · 6-8Projected reserveMississippi State12 GP • 7.3 MPG • 3.2 PPG • 1.7 RPG • 0.2 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 72 (2024)
Jake Wilkins · F · So. · 6-9Projected reserveGeorgia32 GP • 10.0 MPG • 4.9 PPG • 1.8 RPG • 0.4 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 45 (2025)
Michael Cooper · G · So. · 6-3Projected reserveWright State31 GP • 26.3 MPG • 13.4 PPG • 2.7 RPG • 2.2 APGN/A
Gabriel Sularski · G · Fr. · 6-6Projected reserveLayton Christian Academy (Utah) (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 194 (2026)
Mantas Kočanas · C · Jr. · 6-11Projected reserveCalifornia22 GP • 6.8 MPG • 1.7 PPG • 1.5 RPG • 0.1 APGN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

17. Boston College — 4–14 ACC

Luke Murray’s first Boston College team has enough experienced perimeter players to be competitive, but building a sustainable ACC identity is a different challenge from collecting productive transfers. The Eagles are replacing the previous staff’s core and asking a new group to learn unfamiliar responsibilities together. MMH’s seventeenth-place projection reflects that transition and the league’s depth rather than a claim that Boston College has no useful players.

Montana transfer Money Williams is the principal backcourt attraction. Ernest Shelton arrives from Merrimack with shooting production, while Armoni Zeigler moves from Ball State. Charleston transfer Colby Duggan offers forward scoring, and George Washington transfer Luke Hunger supplies an experienced interior option. Those five form MMH’s initial starting projection, with a clear need to establish how the offense functions when an opponent takes Williams out of the first action.

The reserves offer competition rather than empty roster spots. Brandon Benjamin arrives from Fairfield, Jacob Furphy from UConn, Aly Tounkara from Arkansas State, JB Frankel from Northeastern, and Andrija Bukumirovic from UT Martin. Tounkara can alter the interior combination, while Frankel provides another experienced guard. Freshmen outside this projected ten still have a route into the rotation, but MMH is initially prioritizing college experience.

The main question is defensive translation. Productive players from several different leagues now have to contain ACC guards, communicate through screens, and finish possessions against bigger frontcourts. Murray’s offensive background is appealing, but the Eagles cannot afford to require an excellent shooting night simply to stay competitive. A dependable defensive baseline would make the entire rebuilding process easier.

Blue Ribbon’s printed conference forecast lists Boston College twice and omits Georgia Tech, so MMH does not assign the Eagles a guessed Blue Ribbon placement. The media poll has them seventeenth. A four-win conference projection leaves room for meaningful improvement over expectations without assuming that a new staff and a heavily changed roster will settle every important question before January.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Money Williams · G · Sr. · 6-4Projected starterMontana34 GP • 31.4 MPG • 20.6 PPG • 4.3 RPG • 4.7 APGN/A
Ernest Shelton · G · Sr. · 6-5Projected starterMerrimack34 GP • 36.9 MPG • 15.9 PPG • 3.1 RPG • 0.9 APGN/A
Armoni Zeigler · G · Sr. · 6-4Projected starterBall State31 GP • 32.5 MPG • 12.5 PPG • 5.1 RPG • 3.3 APGN/A
Colby Duggan · F · Sr. · 6-7Projected starterCharleston19 GP • 28.1 MPG • 9.3 PPG • 2.4 RPG • 2.3 APGN/A
Luke Hunger · F · Gr. · 6-10Projected starterGeorge Washington33 GP • 19.1 MPG • 8.4 PPG • 5.1 RPG • 0.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 201 (2022)

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Brandon Benjamin · F · So. · 6-8Projected reserveFairfield32 GP • 31.3 MPG • 14.2 PPG • 10.4 RPG • 1.2 APGN/A
Jacob Furphy · G · So. · 6-5Projected reserveUConn14 GP • 2.6 MPG • 0.4 PPG • 0.1 RPG • 0.0 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 178 (2025)
Aly Tounkara · F · Jr. · 7-0Projected reserveArkansas State32 GP • 18.3 MPG • 4.3 PPG • 5.5 RPG • 0.5 APGN/A
JB Frankel · G · Gr. · 6-3Projected reserveNortheastern30 GP • N/A MPG • 5.9 PPG • N/A RPG • 1.9 APGN/A
Andrija Bukumirovic · G/F · Sr. · 6-7Projected reserveUT Martin32 GP • 29.2 MPG • 13.8 PPG • 7.8 RPG • 1.0 APGN/A

Team profile · Current official roster

18. Georgia Tech — 4–14 ACC

Scott Cross brings established college coaching experience to Georgia Tech, but his first ACC roster requires patience. The Yellow Jackets must replace Baye Ndongo’s interior production and other major contributors while combining transfer guards, young big men, and freshmen whose roles are not yet settled. MMH projects eighteenth because the roster’s uncertainty is concentrated in areas that ACC opponents can exploit immediately.

San Jose State transfer Colby Garland is the clearest source of proven creation. He averaged 20.3 points and 4.6 assists last season, giving Cross a guard who can initiate an offense rather than merely finish a designed action. Lehigh transfer Nasir Whitlock adds another scoring option. Returning wing Kam Craft supplies perimeter shooting, while Troy transfer Víctor Valdés and West Virginia transfer Jackson Fields provide experienced forward choices.

Fields’ previous season was limited to nine games, so a larger workload is not automatic. The reserves include Washington transfer Courtland Muldrew, returning center Cole Kirouac, and Ole Miss transfer Tylis Jordan, who redshirted last season. Freshmen Kayden Allen and Moustapha Diop bring upside, but their development must occur alongside the immediate need to defend and rebound at an ACC level.

Georgia Tech’s initial starting projection leans on Garland, Whitlock, Craft, Valdés, and Fields. Cross may need a bigger combination against certain opponents. That creates a tradeoff: adding an inexperienced center can improve the lineup’s size while placing greater demands on the guards to create efficient offense and keep the ball moving.

The best case is that Garland’s creation travels, the shooting remains credible, and one of the young interior players becomes dependable earlier than expected. The concern is a defense that concedes too many second chances and an offense overly dependent on difficult guard scoring. Blue Ribbon’s omitted forecast entry is marked N/A rather than inferred. A four-win ACC projection is cautious, but it still allows Tech to demonstrate progress while Cross establishes a more durable foundation.

Projected starters

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Colby Garland · Guard · Sr. · 6-1Projected starterSan Jose State29 GP • 35.1 MPG • 20.3 PPG • 3.3 RPG • 4.6 APGN/A
Nasir Whitlock · Guard · Sr. · 6-2Projected starterLehigh35 GP • 35.0 MPG • 20.5 PPG • 3.5 RPG • 3.3 APGN/A
Kam Craft · Guard/Forward · 5th · 6-6Projected starterGeorgia Tech29 GP • 21.4 MPG • 7.3 PPG • 2.1 RPG • 0.9 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 57 (2022)
Víctor Valdés · Forward · Sr. · 6-7Projected starterTroy33 GP • 29.2 MPG • 14.8 PPG • 4.0 RPG • 4.5 APGN/A
Jackson Fields · Forward · 5th · 6-9Projected starterWest Virginia9 GP • 14.2 MPG • 4.3 PPG • 3.4 RPG • 1.1 APGN/A

Projected reserves

PlayerRolePrevious team2025–26Recruiting
Courtland Muldrew · Guard · So. · 6-3Projected reserveWashington20 GP • 12.7 MPG • 3.2 PPG • 1.9 RPG • 1.4 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 110 (2025)
Kayden Allen · Guard · Fr. · 6-6Projected reserveMontverde Academy (HS)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 73 (2026)
Moustapha Diop · Forward · Fr. · 6-11Projected reserveOvertime Elite (pre-college)N/A — no prior college seasonRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 118 (2026)
Tylis Jordan · Forward · So. · 6-10Projected reserveOle MissN/A — did not play (redshirt/injury)Rivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 47 (2025)
Cole Kirouac · Center · So. · 7-0Projected reserveGeorgia Tech23 GP • 11.4 MPG • 1.7 PPG • 2.3 RPG • 0.3 APGRivals/On3 recruiting profile No. 245 (2025)

Team profile · Current official roster

Sources and availability

The supplied 2026–27 Blue Ribbon yearbook is the primary scouting reference, updated against official rosters, individual biographies, final season statistics, recruiting profiles, and subsequent injury and eligibility reporting. The supplied Torvik screenshot is a fixed reader-provided snapshot, not a claim about today’s live rankings. Its original capture time is unknown. No source’s forecast is presented as MMH’s own projection. The accompanying research files identify field-level sources, missing information, and temporary eligibility assumptions.