
Florida A&M
14-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.7%Florida A&M
85.3%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCreighton -12.0
PROJECTED TOTAL148.8
MODEL MONEYLINECreighton -580

Creighton
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 68
Projected Total148.8
Projected ScoreCreighton 80
Team Comparison
39.4MMH Power Index50.6
98.7Offensive Efficiency109.0
105.6Defensive Efficiency109.5
-6.9Net Efficiency-0.5
-3.2Strength of Schedule5.1
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
70.6Tempo68.9
49.2%Effective FG%53.0%
21.6%Turnover Rate16.6%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
38.0%Free Throw Rate29.0%
-4.8Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Creighton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCreighton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.6–39.4), offensive efficiency (109.0–98.7), net efficiency (-0.5–-6.9), strength of schedule (5.1–-3.2).
Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.6–109.5), recent form (4.5–-5.2), offensive rebounding (30.5–26.6).