Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.6%Texas A&M
77.4%Ohio State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOhio State -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL156.5
MODEL MONEYLINEOhio State -342
Ohio State logo

Ohio State

21-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 74
Projected Total156.5
Projected ScoreOhio State 82

Team Comparison

58MMH Power Index64.5
116.1Offensive Efficiency118.1
108.4Defensive Efficiency108.1
7.7Net Efficiency10.0
4.8Strength of Schedule6.4
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency6.3
69.1Tempo67.2
53.5%Effective FG%56.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
37.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
5.3Average Margin6.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Ohio State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOhio State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–58.0), offensive efficiency (118.1–116.1), defensive efficiency (108.1–108.4), net efficiency (10.0–7.7).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHball security (14.8–15.3), offensive rebounding (31.7–30.7).
Final
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
73—66
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
Texas A&M by 7 • 65.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATOhio State
27-63FG26-62
42.9%FG%41.9%
3-183PT4-19
16.7%3PT%21.1%
16-23FT10-17
69.6%FT%58.8%
45Rebounds35
16Offensive Rebounds12
8Assists11
6Turnovers8
3Steals2
1Blocks10
18Fouls21

Player Box Score

Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyrece RadfordGuard358-171-54-650000021
Wade Taylor IVGuard308-211-94-624200021
Henry Coleman IIIForward368-140-04-4112000020
Hayden HefnerGuard271-31-11-22100004
Andersson GarciaForward261-30-02-213001004
Eli LawrenceGuard51-20-10-00000002
Solomon WashingtonF140-10-11-24000001
Jace CarterNot Available180-10-10-12010000
Manny ObasekiGuard50-00-00-01100000
Wildens LevequeForward40-10-00-01000000
Ohio State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Bruce ThorntonG318-202-86-925100024
Jamison BattleForward234-82-50-040100010
Roddy Gayle Jr.G364-120-31-27600009
Zed KeyForward194-50-00-17000008
Evan MahaffeyF302-30-02-25002006
Dale BonnerGuard162-50-10-00000004
Felix OkparaF221-30-01-23004003
Scotty MiddletonF161-50-10-10001002
Devin RoyalF70-10-10-03003000

Advanced Game Stats

65.0Possessions65.0
112.3Offensive Efficiency101.5
101.5Defensive Efficiency112.3
10.8Net Efficiency-10.8
45.2%Effective FG%45.2%
49.4%True Shooting %47.1%
9.4%Turnover Rate12.1%
36.5%Free Throw Rate27.4%
28.6%3-Point Rate30.6%
1.33Assist / Turnover1.38
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 65.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.