
East Texas A&M
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.4%East Texas A&M
96.6%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -21.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.6
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -2841

Kentucky
22-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 65
Projected Total151.6
Projected ScoreKentucky 87
Team Comparison
38.4MMH Power Index63.9
101.2Offensive Efficiency115.2
107.5Defensive Efficiency106.3
-6.3Net Efficiency8.9
-1.5Strength of Schedule8.7
-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
69.3Tempo69.9
50.7%Effective FG%53.2%
18.7%Turnover Rate15.4%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
31.9%Free Throw Rate38.0%
-4.3Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY96.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–38.4), offensive efficiency (115.2–101.2), defensive efficiency (106.3–107.5), net efficiency (8.9–-6.3).