Alabama

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.5%Alabama

71.5%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -6.7

PROJECTED TOTAL168.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -251

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama 81

Projected Total168.2

Projected ScorePurdue 87

Team Comparison

AlabamaMetricPurdue

69.5MMH Power Index73.2

121.6Offensive Efficiency124.8

111.2Defensive Efficiency107.8

10.4Net Efficiency17.0

9.4Strength of Schedule7.6

9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

74.7Tempo65.4

54.9%Effective FG%57.8%

13.0%Turnover Rate13.7%

32.1%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

36.9%Free Throw Rate29.1%

7.7Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–69.5), offensive efficiency (124.8–121.6), defensive efficiency (107.8–111.2), net efficiency (17.0–10.4).

Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (9.4–7.6), ball security (13.0–13.7), free throw rate (36.9–29.1).

Final

Alabama

78—87

Purdue

Purdue by 9 • 67.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AlabamaTEAM STATPurdue

28-63FG31-63

44.0%FG%49.0%

9-293PT9-16

31.0%3PT%56.0%

13-15FT16-25

87.0%FT%64.0%

37Rebounds35

11Offensive Rebounds10

18Assists18

8Turnovers3

1Steals2

6Blocks4

22Fouls17

Player Box Score

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Labaron Philon Jr.	G	27	7-10	3-4	1-1	5	4	0	0	18
Mark Sears	Guard	35	5-15	1-6	4-4	4	6	0	0	15
Grant Nelson	Forward	29	5-7	1-3	1-1	11	1	1	1	12
Latrell Wrightsell	G	31	4-8	3-6	0-0	0	2	0	0	11
Clifford Omoruyi	Center	22	2-5	0-0	3-4	7	0	0	4	7
Aden Holloway	G	17	3-7	1-4	0-0	1	2	0	0	7
Derrion Reid	F	13	2-6	0-1	0-1	4	2	0	0	4
Mouhamed Dioubate	F	9	0-1	0-1	4-4	3	1	0	1	4
Jarin Stevenson	F	14	0-4	0-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Aiden Sherrell	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	30	12-23	1-1	1-4	8	4	0	0	26
Braden Smith	G	37	6-18	0-4	5-6	6	10	1	0	17
Fletcher Loyer	G	31	5-9	3-5	4-5	2	2	1	0	17
C.J. Cox	G	18	4-5	3-3	0-1	1	0	0	0	11
Caleb Furst	Forward	13	1-2	0-0	4-5	2	0	0	0	6
Camden Heide	F	24	1-3	1-2	2-4	8	1	0	1	5
Raleigh Burgess	F	4	2-3	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Myles Colvin	G	20	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	2	0
Gicarri Harris	G	14	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Will Berg	C	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.5Possessions67.5

115.6Offensive Efficiency128.9

128.9Defensive Efficiency115.6

-13.3Net Efficiency13.3

51.6%Effective FG%56.3%

55.6%True Shooting %58.1%

11.9%Turnover Rate4.4%

23.8%Free Throw Rate39.7%

46.0%3-Point Rate25.4%

2.25Assist / Turnover6.00

Game Summary

Purdue won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 67.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.