Xavier logo

Xavier

15-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.1%Xavier
95.9%Purdue
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPurdue -20.8
PROJECTED TOTAL159.1
MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -2339
Purdue logo

Purdue

30-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreXavier 69
Projected Total159.1
Projected ScorePurdue 90

Team Comparison

49.5MMH Power Index73.2
109.2Offensive Efficiency124.8
112.4Defensive Efficiency107.8
-3.2Net Efficiency17.0
5.6Strength of Schedule7.6
-7.4Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8
71.7Tempo65.4
51.7%Effective FG%57.8%
13.9%Turnover Rate13.7%
26.2%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
28.9%Free Throw Rate29.1%
-2.3Average Margin11.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–49.5), offensive efficiency (124.8–109.2), defensive efficiency (107.8–112.4), net efficiency (17.0–-3.2).
Final
Xavier logo
Xavier
71—83
Purdue logo
Purdue
Purdue by 12 • 72.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

XavierTEAM STATPurdue
30-67FG29-57
44.8%FG%50.9%
7-253PT7-15
28.0%3PT%46.7%
4-6FT18-21
66.7%FT%85.7%
29Rebounds34
8Offensive Rebounds5
15Assists19
10Turnovers11
8Steals4
1Blocks6
17Fouls11

Player Box Score

Xavier
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Desmond ClaudeG366-112-21-236000015
Gytis NemeiksaF254-112-50-070000010
Dailyn SwainG224-71-21-212100010
Trey GreenG224-122-90-012100010
Dayvion McKnightGuard324-90-20-02530008
Quincy OlivariGuard222-80-52-23011006
Abou OusmaneForward103-60-00-03010006
Sasa CianiF202-20-00-05010004
Kachi NzehF111-10-00-01000002
Purdue
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zach EdeyCenter339-170-010-11111040028
Braden SmithG336-110-10-067000012
Fletcher LoyerG264-91-42-243200011
Myles ColvinG113-33-30-00000009
Lance JonesGuard302-81-33-40520008
Caleb FurstForward131-11-12-24202005
Camden HeideF102-20-00-01000004
Ethan MortonGuard101-11-10-01100003
Mason GillisForward171-30-20-02000002
Trey Kaufman-RennF170-20-01-23000001

Advanced Game Stats

72.5Possessions72.5
97.9Offensive Efficiency114.5
114.5Defensive Efficiency97.9
-16.6Net Efficiency16.6
50.0%Effective FG%57.0%
50.8%True Shooting %62.0%
13.9%Turnover Rate15.1%
9.0%Free Throw Rate36.8%
37.3%3-Point Rate26.3%
1.50Assist / Turnover1.73
Game Summary
Purdue won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 72.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.