
Stonehill
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.2%Stonehill
96.8%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -21.3
PROJECTED TOTAL145.5
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -3025

Kentucky
22-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 62
Projected Total145.5
Projected ScoreKentucky 83
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index63.9
97.5Offensive Efficiency115.2
100.7Defensive Efficiency106.3
-3.2Net Efficiency8.9
-5.4Strength of Schedule8.7
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
68.1Tempo69.9
48.0%Effective FG%53.2%
19.1%Turnover Rate15.4%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
29.2%Free Throw Rate38.0%
-2.2Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY96.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–37.9), offensive efficiency (115.2–97.5), net efficiency (8.9–-3.2), strength of schedule (8.7–-5.4).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–106.3).