Chicago State

7-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.0%Chicago State

93.0%Bowling Green

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBowling Green -20.1

PROJECTED TOTAL148.8

MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -1329

Bowling Green

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChicago State 64

Projected Total148.8

Projected ScoreBowling Green 84

Team Comparison

Chicago StateMetricBowling Green

36.1MMH Power Index54.7

99.4Offensive Efficiency112.6

114.9Defensive Efficiency99.1

-15.5Net Efficiency13.5

0.5Strength of Schedule-4.7

-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4

66.2Tempo72.2

45.6%Effective FG%53.4%

15.8%Turnover Rate15.9%

29.1%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

30.7%Free Throw Rate38.7%

-10.3Average Margin9.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–36.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–99.4), defensive efficiency (99.1–114.9), net efficiency (13.5–-15.5).

Chicago State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-4.7), ball security (15.8–15.9).

Final

Chicago State

41—70

Bowling Green

Bowling Green by 29 • 69.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Chicago StateTEAM STATBowling Green

14-56FG26-59

25.0%FG%44.0%

4-163PT7-28

25.0%3PT%25.0%

9-15FT11-20

60.0%FT%55.0%

38Rebounds47

10Offensive Rebounds11

6Assists13

15Turnovers13

8Steals4

1Blocks6

19Fouls17

Player Box Score

Chicago State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wesley Cardet Jr.	Guard	35	5-15	1-4	1-3	5	4	0	0	12
Jahsean Corbett	Guard	36	3-12	1-2	2-2	6	1	1	0	9
Deshawn Jean-Charles	G	33	2-12	1-4	4-4	10	0	0	0	9
Noble Crawford	Forward	17	1-3	1-2	1-2	4	0	2	0	4
Cameron Jernigan	Forward	13	2-4	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	4
Tristan Arneaud	Guard	21	1-4	0-0	0-0	0	0	2	0	2
Brent Davis	Guard	23	0-3	0-1	1-2	1	1	2	1	1
A.J. Neal Jr.	G	15	0-1	0-1	0-2	1	0	0	0	0
Greg Spate	G	7	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Bowling Green

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Marcus Hill	G	27	7-14	1-3	3-4	5	2	1	1	18
Rashaun Agee	F	20	7-10	0-0	0-0	8	1	1	1	14
DJ Smith	G	21	2-6	0-3	6-6	3	1	1	0	10
Sam Towns	F	22	3-3	0-0	0-1	4	0	1	0	6
Anthony McComb III	G	12	2-7	1-4	0-0	3	1	0	0	5
Da'Shawn Phillip	Guard	20	1-3	1-3	1-2	10	1	0	1	4
Jason Spurgin	Center	24	1-5	1-4	0-0	6	0	0	3	3
P.J. Edwards	G	21	1-3	1-3	0-2	1	4	0	0	3
DaJion Humphrey	G	17	1-3	1-3	0-0	4	3	0	0	3
EJay Greer	Guard	8	1-3	1-3	0-2	0	0	0	0	3
JZ Zaher	Guard	4	0-1	0-1	1-3	0	0	0	0	1
Greg Spurgin	F	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.3Possessions69.3

59.2Offensive Efficiency101.0

101.0Defensive Efficiency59.2

-41.8Net Efficiency41.8

28.6%Effective FG%50.0%

32.5%True Shooting %51.1%

22.0%Turnover Rate18.4%

26.8%Free Throw Rate33.9%

28.6%3-Point Rate47.5%

0.40Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Bowling Green won by 29 points. The game played at approximately 69.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.