
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.8%Queens University
63.2%Marshall
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMarshall -5.4
PROJECTED TOTAL168.9
MODEL MONEYLINEMarshall -172

Marshall
19-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 82
Projected Total168.9
Projected ScoreMarshall 87
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index52
118.4Offensive Efficiency114.7
117.0Defensive Efficiency110.3
1.4Net Efficiency4.4
0.1Strength of Schedule0.9
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.9
71.4Tempo70.7
56.6%Effective FG%55.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.5%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
37.6%Free Throw Rate29.7%
0.9Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Marshall HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMarshall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.0–51.7), defensive efficiency (110.3–117.0), net efficiency (4.4–1.4), strength of schedule (0.9–0.1).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–114.7), recent form (1.5–-4.9), shooting efficiency (56.6–55.2).