
Brown
9-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.2%Brown
81.8%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -9.0
PROJECTED TOTAL146.7
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -449

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBrown 69
Projected Total146.7
Projected ScoreColgate 78
Team Comparison
39.9MMH Power Index48.8
102.7Offensive Efficiency111.7
102.3Defensive Efficiency109.0
0.4Net Efficiency2.7
-4.9Strength of Schedule-2.0
-11.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
68.5Tempo68.4
50.4%Effective FG%54.5%
18.8%Turnover Rate14.8%
30.0%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
28.2%Free Throw Rate30.0%
0.3Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–39.9), offensive efficiency (111.7–102.7), net efficiency (2.7–0.4), strength of schedule (-2.0–-4.9).
Brown COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.3–109.0), offensive rebounding (30.0–26.9).