North Carolina A&T

11-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.6%North Carolina A&T

81.4%Pittsburgh

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPittsburgh -9.9

PROJECTED TOTAL149.0

MODEL MONEYLINEPittsburgh -438

Pittsburgh

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Carolina A&T 70

Projected Total149.0

Projected ScorePittsburgh 79

Team Comparison

North Carolina A&TMetricPittsburgh

41.8MMH Power Index50.5

107.4Offensive Efficiency108.4

111.4Defensive Efficiency110.4

-4.0Net Efficiency-2.0

-1.5Strength of Schedule5.5

-11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9

69.9Tempo65.0

51.5%Effective FG%51.4%

18.4%Turnover Rate17.3%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %33.1%

46.7%Free Throw Rate31.2%

-2.8Average Margin-1.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Pittsburgh HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPittsburgh holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.5–41.8), offensive efficiency (108.4–107.4), defensive efficiency (110.4–111.4), net efficiency (-2.0–-4.0).

North Carolina A&T COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.5–51.4), free throw rate (46.7–31.2).

Final

North Carolina A&T

52—100

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh by 48 • 74.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North Carolina A&TTEAM STATPittsburgh

19-70FG40-71

27.0%FG%56.0%

8-343PT12-29

24.0%3PT%41.0%

6-9FT8-17

67.0%FT%47.0%

28Rebounds58

9Offensive Rebounds15

9Assists21

9Turnovers10

5Steals5

6Blocks9

17Fouls12

Player Box Score

North Carolina A&T

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kyle Duke	G	29	6-16	3-6	0-0	6	2	1	1	15
Uchenna Kellman-Nicholes	G	24	5-11	2-8	0-2	1	3	0	0	12
Camian Shell	G	23	3-7	1-2	2-2	2	2	1	0	9
Landon Glasper	Guard	35	1-16	0-12	4-5	2	0	0	1	6
Nikos Chitikoudis	F	29	1-4	1-1	0-0	5	0	1	2	3
Jeremy Robinson	Forward	13	1-5	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jalal McKie	G	12	1-5	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Ahmad Hamilton	Guard	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Evan Joyner	Forward	33	0-5	0-0	0-0	4	1	2	2	0

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bub Carrington	Guard	29	7-12	4-7	0-0	12	10	0	0	18
Jorge Diaz Graham	F	16	5-5	3-3	1-1	5	0	0	1	14
Federiko Federiko	F	26	6-9	0-0	1-4	10	1	0	4	13
Blake Hinson	Forward	21	5-11	2-5	1-2	8	2	0	0	13
Ishmael Leggett	Guard	25	4-7	1-2	2-2	5	2	0	0	11
Zack Austin	Forward	22	4-9	0-3	0-2	4	2	0	1	8
Will Jeffress	F	17	2-4	0-2	3-4	4	0	3	1	7
Guillermo Diaz Graham	F	14	2-4	1-3	0-0	5	1	1	2	5
Jaland Lowe	G	20	2-6	0-2	0-0	1	3	1	0	4
Michael Hueitt Jr.	Guard	8	2-3	0-1	0-2	1	0	0	0	4
KJ Marshall	Guard	2	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

74.2Possessions74.2

70.1Offensive Efficiency134.8

134.8Defensive Efficiency70.1

-64.7Net Efficiency64.7

32.9%Effective FG%64.8%

35.0%True Shooting %63.2%

12.1%Turnover Rate13.5%

12.9%Free Throw Rate23.9%

48.6%3-Point Rate40.8%

1.00Assist / Turnover2.10

Game Summary

Pittsburgh won by 48 points. The game played at approximately 74.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.