
Bradley
21-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.3%Bradley
68.7%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -6.0
PROJECTED TOTAL154.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -219

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBradley 74
Projected Total154.4
Projected ScoreUAB 80
Team Comparison
54.4MMH Power Index56.9
110.5Offensive Efficiency110.5
105.3Defensive Efficiency102.9
5.2Net Efficiency7.6
1.6Strength of Schedule0.4
0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
69.9Tempo71.7
51.2%Effective FG%48.8%
13.9%Turnover Rate12.4%
27.7%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
37.2%Free Throw Rate36.9%
3.6Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–54.4), defensive efficiency (102.9–105.3), net efficiency (7.6–5.2), recent form (2.9–0.9).
Bradley COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.6–0.4), shooting efficiency (51.2–48.8), free throw rate (37.2–36.9).