Central Arkansas logo

Central Arkansas

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.3%Central Arkansas
84.7%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -11.8
PROJECTED TOTAL160.8
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -554
Tulsa logo

Tulsa

30-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCentral Arkansas 75
Projected Total160.8
Projected ScoreTulsa 86

Team Comparison

54MMH Power Index64.8
113.9Offensive Efficiency121.1
105.2Defensive Efficiency104.8
8.7Net Efficiency16.3
-3.9Strength of Schedule0.0
9.8Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
71.0Tempo70.2
54.3%Effective FG%55.4%
15.3%Turnover Rate15.4%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
30.7%Free Throw Rate42.4%
6.1Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–54.0), offensive efficiency (121.1–113.9), defensive efficiency (104.8–105.2), net efficiency (16.3–8.7).
Central Arkansas COUNTERS WITHball security (15.3–15.4).
Final
Central Arkansas logo
Central Arkansas
53—70
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
Tulsa by 17 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Central ArkansasTEAM STATTulsa
20-60FG24-60
33.0%FG%40.0%
6-203PT8-29
30.0%3PT%28.0%
7-12FT14-20
58.0%FT%70.0%
31Rebounds51
11Offensive Rebounds20
9Assists13
12Turnovers18
8Steals8
5Blocks3
18Fouls15

Player Box Score

Central Arkansas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Elias CatoForward297-131-24-620110019
Carl Daughtery Jr.G248-143-50-060010019
Tucker AndersonF301-90-41-22010003
Johannes KirsipuuG251-81-40-01430003
Daniel SofieldGuard211-31-20-01100003
Ubong-Abasi EtimC261-50-00-09202002
Caleb CarrF41-10-00-00000002
Masai OlowokereGuard210-50-21-23120001
Ibbe KlintmanGuard200-20-11-23111001
Tulsa
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cobe WilliamsGuard305-132-91-234210013
PJ HaggertyG313-131-65-765400012
Isaiah BarnesG264-80-23-362000011
Tyshawn ArchieG154-82-41-102100011
Matt ReedF223-31-11-26000008
Jared GarciaF232-61-22-210011007
Jarred HallF171-50-21-37000003
Carlous WilliamsF151-31-30-03000003
Mohamed KeitaC181-10-00-03001002
Ari SealsGuard30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1
79.0Offensive Efficiency104.3
104.3Defensive Efficiency79.0
-25.3Net Efficiency25.3
38.3%Effective FG%46.7%
40.3%True Shooting %50.4%
18.0%Turnover Rate26.7%
20.0%Free Throw Rate33.3%
33.3%3-Point Rate48.3%
0.75Assist / Turnover0.72
Game Summary
Tulsa won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.