
Presbyterian
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.8%Presbyterian
95.2%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -20.0
PROJECTED TOTAL155.1
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -1983

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePresbyterian 68
Projected Total155.1
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 88
Team Comparison
46.6MMH Power Index68.9
107.2Offensive Efficiency120.9
106.9Defensive Efficiency105.7
0.3Net Efficiency15.2
-1.6Strength of Schedule7.4
-2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
67.5Tempo70.9
52.3%Effective FG%55.3%
19.3%Turnover Rate13.5%
33.7%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
41.1%Free Throw Rate39.3%
0.2Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–46.6), offensive efficiency (120.9–107.2), defensive efficiency (105.7–106.9), net efficiency (15.2–0.3).
Presbyterian COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.7–30.8), free throw rate (41.1–39.3).