
Lipscomb
18-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.5%Lipscomb
58.5%Drake
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDrake -2.8
PROJECTED TOTAL152.4
MODEL MONEYLINEDrake -141

Drake
14-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLipscomb 75
Projected Total152.4
Projected ScoreDrake 78
Team Comparison
47.9MMH Power Index46.4
111.3Offensive Efficiency109.5
107.6Defensive Efficiency109.1
3.7Net Efficiency0.4
-2.5Strength of Schedule0.3
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.3
68.8Tempo68.6
54.8%Effective FG%52.2%
16.0%Turnover Rate14.9%
25.9%Offensive Rebound %27.2%
26.5%Free Throw Rate34.4%
2.5Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–46.4), offensive efficiency (111.3–109.5), defensive efficiency (107.6–109.1), net efficiency (3.7–0.4).
Drake COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.3–-2.5), ball security (14.9–16.0), offensive rebounding (27.2–25.9).