American University logo

American University

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.4%American University
75.6%William & Mary
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL156.3
MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -310
William & Mary logo

William & Mary

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAmerican University 74
Projected Total156.3
Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 82

Team Comparison

48.2MMH Power Index53.8
110.6Offensive Efficiency112.5
105.8Defensive Efficiency105.2
4.8Net Efficiency7.3
-4.3Strength of Schedule-1.5
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5
67.5Tempo73.9
52.6%Effective FG%55.3%
15.7%Turnover Rate16.4%
28.0%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
30.1%Free Throw Rate45.3%
3.3Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–48.2), offensive efficiency (112.5–110.6), defensive efficiency (105.2–105.8), net efficiency (7.3–4.8).
American University COUNTERS WITHball security (15.7–16.4), offensive rebounding (28.0–26.7).
Final
American University logo
American University
56—75
William & Mary logo
William & Mary
William & Mary by 19 • 67.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

American UniversityTEAM STATWilliam & Mary
22-60FG22-45
37.0%FG%49.0%
5-273PT7-20
19.0%3PT%35.0%
7-10FT24-32
70.0%FT%75.0%
32Rebounds34
10Offensive Rebounds6
10Assists11
12Turnovers14
7Steals5
1Blocks—
26Fouls16

Player Box Score

American University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jermaine Ballisager WebbC125-90-02-350000012
Matt MayockF173-52-40-01100008
Lorenzo DonadioGuard293-71-30-06220007
Geoff SprouseG252-82-81-22100007
Elijah StephensGuard313-80-30-04510006
Matt RogersForward282-80-22-24000006
Lincoln BallGuard282-70-20-06120004
Colin SmallsGuard182-80-50-01010004
Greg JonesF110-00-02-32011002
William & Mary
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Sean HouptGuard304-74-65-610100017
Gabe DorseyGuard302-52-48-891000014
Trey MossG256-110-22-210100014
Jack KarasinskiF234-60-21-33000009
Chase LoweG232-40-04-44500008
Matteus CaseGuard242-40-23-45220007
Caleb DorseyForward221-71-40-16100003
Charlie WilliamsC131-10-01-21200003
Tai HamiltonF100-00-00-20010000

Advanced Game Stats

67.5Possessions67.5
83.0Offensive Efficiency111.1
111.1Defensive Efficiency83.0
-28.1Net Efficiency28.1
40.8%Effective FG%56.7%
43.2%True Shooting %62.3%
18.0%Turnover Rate20.5%
16.7%Free Throw Rate71.1%
45.0%3-Point Rate44.4%
0.83Assist / Turnover0.79
Game Summary
William & Mary won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 67.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.