Army

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

34.7%Army

65.3%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADStonehill -5.7

PROJECTED TOTAL142.3

MODEL MONEYLINEStonehill -188

Stonehill

12-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreArmy 68

Projected Total142.3

Projected ScoreStonehill 74

Team Comparison

ArmyMetricStonehill

36.8MMH Power Index37.9

104.8Offensive Efficiency97.5

112.1Defensive Efficiency100.7

-7.3Net Efficiency-3.2

-3.3Strength of Schedule-5.4

-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4

68.9Tempo68.1

49.8%Effective FG%48.0%

17.3%Turnover Rate19.1%

31.0%Offensive Rebound %28.4%

26.5%Free Throw Rate29.2%

-5.1Average Margin-2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Stonehill HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (37.9–36.8), defensive efficiency (100.7–112.1), net efficiency (-3.2–-7.3), recent form (-3.4–-10.6).

Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (104.8–97.5), strength of schedule (-3.3–-5.4), shooting efficiency (49.8–48.0).

Final

Army

44—57

Stonehill

Stonehill by 13 • 65.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArmyTEAM STATStonehill

18-69FG21-42

26.0%FG%50.0%

5-313PT8-18

16.0%3PT%44.0%

3-7FT7-13

43.0%FT%54.0%

44Rebounds35

20Offensive Rebounds1

11Assists8

14Turnovers17

8Steals7

1Blocks3

16Fouls17

Player Box Score

Army

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jared Cross	Guard	26	4-13	3-8	0-1	6	1	0	0	11
Abe Johnson	Forward	19	3-6	0-0	2-2	5	1	0	0	8
Charlie Peterson	Forward	17	3-9	0-2	1-3	9	0	0	0	7
Blake Barker	Guard	28	2-9	2-8	0-0	3	2	1	0	6
Kwabena Davis	Guard	26	3-10	0-3	0-0	3	1	1	1	6
AJ Allenspach	Forward	20	1-4	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	0	2
Josh Scovens	F	18	1-8	0-4	0-0	3	0	1	0	2
Chanse Perkins	F	0	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Dylan Blair	G	20	0-4	0-4	0-0	0	3	3	0	0
Ryan Curry	G	19	0-4	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Matt Dove	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-1	1	0	0	0	0
Jorn Everson	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Kendall Hailey	Guard	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Zegarowski	Forward	39	7-13	6-10	1-4	8	0	0	1	21
Jackson Benigni	G	28	7-12	0-2	0-0	2	1	2	0	14
Shane O'Dell	Forward	28	4-10	0-1	2-5	5	1	2	0	10
Tony Felder	Guard	28	1-3	0-1	2-2	4	5	0	0	4
Nathan McGill	Guard	23	1-1	1-1	0-0	3	0	1	1	3
Pano Pavlidis	Forward	19	1-1	1-1	0-0	5	1	0	1	3
Chas Stinson	G	6	0-0	0-0	2-2	3	0	0	0	2
Louie Semona III	F	14	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Todd Brogna	F	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Thatcher Stone	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.3Possessions65.3

67.4Offensive Efficiency87.3

87.3Defensive Efficiency67.4

-19.9Net Efficiency19.9

29.7%Effective FG%59.5%

30.4%True Shooting %59.2%

21.1%Turnover Rate26.5%

10.1%Free Throw Rate31.0%

44.9%3-Point Rate42.9%

0.79Assist / Turnover0.47

Game Summary

Stonehill won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 65.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.