
Utah Valley
25-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
45.6%Utah Valley
54.4%Sam Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL155.8
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -119

Sam Houston
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUtah Valley 77
Projected Total155.8
Projected ScoreSam Houston 78
Team Comparison
59.1MMH Power Index56.1
113.4Offensive Efficiency115.5
97.3Defensive Efficiency105.5
16.1Net Efficiency10.0
-3.3Strength of Schedule-2.2
6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
70.6Tempo71.2
56.0%Effective FG%53.2%
19.9%Turnover Rate16.6%
36.2%Offensive Rebound %37.4%
37.3%Free Throw Rate34.8%
11.4Average Margin7.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY54.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–56.1), defensive efficiency (97.3–105.5), net efficiency (16.1–10.0), recent form (6.8–3.2).
Sam Houston COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.5–113.4), strength of schedule (-2.2–-3.3), ball security (16.6–19.9).