
Omaha
16-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.0%Omaha
90.0%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -14.7
PROJECTED TOTAL153.3
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -900

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOmaha 69
Projected Total153.3
Projected ScoreTCU 84
Team Comparison
44.5MMH Power Index59.7
110.2Offensive Efficiency110.2
110.8Defensive Efficiency102.7
-0.6Net Efficiency7.5
-2.5Strength of Schedule4.6
-4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
69.0Tempo70.2
53.6%Effective FG%50.5%
16.0%Turnover Rate15.3%
27.2%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
34.0%Free Throw Rate38.3%
-0.5Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
TCU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–44.5), defensive efficiency (102.7–110.8), net efficiency (7.5–-0.6), strength of schedule (4.6–-2.5).
Omaha COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.6–50.5).