
Florida A&M
14-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
2.7%Florida A&M
97.3%Nebraska
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNebraska -24.3
PROJECTED TOTAL144.2
MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -3604

Nebraska
28-7MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 60
Projected Total144.2
Projected ScoreNebraska 84
Team Comparison
39.4MMH Power Index67
98.7Offensive Efficiency114.4
105.6Defensive Efficiency98.3
-6.9Net Efficiency16.1
-3.2Strength of Schedule6.1
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8
70.6Tempo67.3
49.2%Effective FG%55.6%
21.6%Turnover Rate14.4%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
38.0%Free Throw Rate26.9%
-4.8Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Nebraska HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY97.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–39.4), offensive efficiency (114.4–98.7), defensive efficiency (98.3–105.6), net efficiency (16.1–-6.9).
Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.5–26.3), free throw rate (38.0–26.9).