
Boston University
16-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.5%Boston University
50.5%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRutgers -0.4
PROJECTED TOTAL149.1
MODEL MONEYLINERutgers -102

Rutgers
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBoston University 74
Projected Total149.1
Projected ScoreRutgers 75
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index45.9
115.3Offensive Efficiency104.2
113.1Defensive Efficiency112.2
2.2Net Efficiency-8.0
-2.7Strength of Schedule3.9
11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
65.4Tempo67.4
58.6%Effective FG%47.4%
17.7%Turnover Rate15.0%
27.4%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
32.2%Free Throw Rate36.3%
1.5Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Boston University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBoston University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–45.9), offensive efficiency (115.3–104.2), net efficiency (2.2–-8.0), recent form (11.2–-1.6).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (112.2–113.1), strength of schedule (3.9–-2.7), ball security (15.0–17.7).