
Princeton
9-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.4%Princeton
90.6%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -15.9
PROJECTED TOTAL141.2
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -964

Hofstra
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePrinceton 63
Projected Total141.2
Projected ScoreHofstra 79
Team Comparison
43.5MMH Power Index59.3
105.1Offensive Efficiency114.0
110.3Defensive Efficiency100.9
-5.2Net Efficiency13.1
1.7Strength of Schedule-2.9
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
65.2Tempo66.2
50.3%Effective FG%52.2%
16.9%Turnover Rate16.1%
27.5%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
35.0%Free Throw Rate32.0%
-3.4Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–43.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–105.1), defensive efficiency (100.9–110.3), net efficiency (13.1–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-2.9), free throw rate (35.0–32.0).