
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.6%UT Rio Grande Valley
30.4%South Dakota
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL155.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -229

South Dakota
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 80
Projected Total155.2
Projected ScoreSouth Dakota 75
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index43.8
112.6Offensive Efficiency110.0
103.1Defensive Efficiency110.8
9.5Net Efficiency-0.8
-1.9Strength of Schedule-4.9
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
67.4Tempo72.4
55.7%Effective FG%50.9%
17.9%Turnover Rate16.3%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
29.6%Free Throw Rate46.2%
6.4Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–43.8), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–110.8), net efficiency (9.5–-0.8).
South Dakota COUNTERS WITHball security (16.3–17.9), offensive rebounding (29.8–29.2), free throw rate (46.2–29.6).