
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.3%Queens University
69.7%Southern Illinois
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSouthern Illinois -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL158.5
MODEL MONEYLINESouthern Illinois -230

Southern Illinois
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 76
Projected Total158.5
Projected ScoreSouthern Illinois 83
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index54.6
118.4Offensive Efficiency103.4
117.0Defensive Efficiency98.5
1.4Net Efficiency4.9
0.1Strength of Schedule1.6
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency7.7
71.4Tempo70.6
56.6%Effective FG%49.5%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
37.6%Free Throw Rate32.3%
0.9Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Southern Illinois HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouthern Illinois holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.6–51.7), defensive efficiency (98.5–117.0), net efficiency (4.9–1.4), strength of schedule (1.6–0.1).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–103.4), shooting efficiency (56.6–49.5), ball security (14.8–17.0).