Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.6%Clemson

54.4%UAB

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -1.9

PROJECTED TOTAL145.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -119

UAB

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 72

Projected Total145.2

Projected ScoreUAB 74

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricUAB

59.9MMH Power Index56.9

112.6Offensive Efficiency110.5

101.4Defensive Efficiency102.9

11.2Net Efficiency7.6

4.6Strength of Schedule0.4

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9

63.6Tempo71.7

53.0%Effective FG%48.8%

14.0%Turnover Rate12.4%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %32.7%

38.1%Free Throw Rate36.9%

7.2Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–56.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.5), defensive efficiency (101.4–102.9), net efficiency (11.2–7.6).

UAB COUNTERS WITHrecent form (2.9–-4.7), ball security (12.4–14.0), offensive rebounding (32.7–27.0).

Final

Clemson

77—76

UAB

Clemson by 1 • 71.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATUAB

27-55FG28-60

49.0%FG%47.0%

6-193PT9-22

32.0%3PT%41.0%

17-27FT11-16

63.0%FT%69.0%

26Rebounds39

5Offensive Rebounds12

16Assists14

10Turnovers14

4Steals5

7Blocks2

16Fouls23

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
PJ Hall	Center	35	11-18	2-4	3-5	9	2	2	3	27
Chase Hunter	Guard	35	6-11	1-2	3-4	1	4	0	0	16
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	22	3-5	1-2	1-1	2	4	0	2	8
Joseph Girard III	Guard	27	1-4	1-3	3-4	2	2	1	0	6
RJ Godfrey	F	16	1-2	0-0	4-6	2	0	0	0	6
Chauncey Wiggins	F	19	1-3	1-1	1-4	2	0	0	1	4
Jack Clark	Forward	14	1-3	0-2	2-3	2	0	0	1	4
Dillon Hunter	G	14	2-5	0-2	0-0	1	3	0	0	4
Bas Leyte	Forward	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Alex Hemenway	G	18	0-3	0-3	0-0	2	1	1	0	0

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Eric Gaines	Guard	33	7-17	3-8	1-2	2	3	4	0	18
Butta Johnson	G	25	7-11	3-5	0-0	3	3	0	1	17
Alejandro Vasquez	Guard	15	4-5	1-2	2-4	3	0	0	0	11
Javian Davis	Forward	17	2-3	0-0	4-4	6	2	0	0	8
Tony Toney	Guard	22	2-5	1-3	1-2	1	2	0	0	6
Yaxel Lendeborg	F	15	2-5	0-0	2-2	5	1	0	1	6
James White	Guard	13	2-4	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Barry Dunning Jr.	G	19	1-4	1-2	0-0	1	1	1	0	3
Daniel Ortiz	Guard	12	1-4	0-2	1-2	1	1	0	0	3
Christian Coleman	G	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Will Shaver	C	14	0-2	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.2Possessions71.2

108.1Offensive Efficiency106.7

106.7Defensive Efficiency108.1

1.4Net Efficiency-1.4

54.5%Effective FG%54.2%

56.8%True Shooting %56.2%

13.7%Turnover Rate20.1%

49.1%Free Throw Rate26.7%

34.5%3-Point Rate36.7%

1.60Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Clemson won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 71.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.