
Incarnate Word
12-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.0%Incarnate Word
94.0%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -18.6
PROJECTED TOTAL156.1
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -1567

Tulsa
30-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 69
Projected Total156.1
Projected ScoreTulsa 87
Team Comparison
44.6MMH Power Index64.8
112.0Offensive Efficiency121.1
111.2Defensive Efficiency104.8
0.8Net Efficiency16.3
-3.6Strength of Schedule0.0
-8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
66.3Tempo70.2
52.2%Effective FG%55.4%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
34.4%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
34.0%Free Throw Rate42.4%
0.5Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–44.6), offensive efficiency (121.1–112.0), defensive efficiency (104.8–111.2), net efficiency (16.3–0.8).
Incarnate Word COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (34.4–33.8).