
Maryland
12-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.6%Maryland
87.4%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -14.2
PROJECTED TOTAL151.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -694

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMaryland 68
Projected Total151.1
Projected ScoreUAB 83
Team Comparison
44.1MMH Power Index56.9
104.5Offensive Efficiency110.5
113.6Defensive Efficiency102.9
-9.1Net Efficiency7.6
5.2Strength of Schedule0.4
-9.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
66.7Tempo71.7
48.6%Effective FG%48.8%
18.8%Turnover Rate12.4%
34.0%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
38.9%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-6.1Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.1), offensive efficiency (110.5–104.5), defensive efficiency (102.9–113.6), net efficiency (7.6–-9.1).
Maryland COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.2–0.4), offensive rebounding (34.0–32.7), free throw rate (38.9–36.9).