Merrimack

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

81.9%Merrimack

18.1%Maine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -8.1

PROJECTED TOTAL130.8

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -452

Maine

8-24

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 69

Projected Total130.8

Projected ScoreMaine 61

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricMaine

53.7MMH Power Index35.6

106.4Offensive Efficiency95.6

103.2Defensive Efficiency104.6

3.2Net Efficiency-9.0

0.7Strength of Schedule-1.8

12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.8

64.4Tempo65.4

49.3%Effective FG%50.5%

14.8%Turnover Rate19.0%

24.7%Offensive Rebound %19.4%

39.5%Free Throw Rate38.5%

2.1Average Margin-5.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–35.6), offensive efficiency (106.4–95.6), defensive efficiency (103.2–104.6), net efficiency (3.2–-9.0).

Maine COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (50.5–49.3).

Final

Merrimack

71—65

Maine

Merrimack by 6 • 66.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATMaine

23-45FG22-55

51.0%FG%40.0%

4-173PT7-22

24.0%3PT%32.0%

21-32FT14-18

66.0%FT%78.0%

31Rebounds33

8Offensive Rebounds12

8Assists14

15Turnovers15

10Steals12

2Blocks2

15Fouls22

Player Box Score

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Adam Clark	G	36	6-9	0-1	7-10	2	3	3	0	19
Samba Diallo	Forward	33	3-7	0-2	8-10	6	2	3	1	14
Devon Savage	Guard	31	3-10	3-8	2-2	5	1	2	0	11
Jaylen Stinson	G	32	3-6	0-2	3-7	5	0	1	0	9
Jordan Derkack	G	12	3-6	0-1	1-3	7	1	0	0	7
Bryan Etumnu	F	11	3-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Jacob O'Connell	Forward	29	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	1	1	1	3
Jordan McKoy	Guard	12	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Armandas Plintauskas	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Maine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ja'Shonte Wright-McLeish	Guard	27	5-7	4-6	3-3	2	0	0	0	17
Kristians Feierbergs	Forward	26	5-9	0-2	2-2	7	0	0	0	12
Peter Filipovity	Forward	23	3-8	0-2	6-6	2	0	1	0	12
Kellen Tynes	Guard	38	4-11	2-4	1-5	1	4	5	0	11
Quion Burns	Guard	19	3-7	1-3	0-0	3	2	0	0	7
Jaden Clayton	G	35	1-8	0-4	0-0	6	6	4	0	2
AJ Lopez	G	18	0-2	0-1	2-2	2	2	2	0	2
Adam Cisse	Forward	8	1-3	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	1	2
Milos Nenadic	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9

106.1Offensive Efficiency97.2

97.2Defensive Efficiency106.1

9.0Net Efficiency-9.0

55.6%Effective FG%46.4%

59.0%True Shooting %51.1%

22.3%Turnover Rate22.5%

71.1%Free Throw Rate32.7%

37.8%3-Point Rate40.0%

0.53Assist / Turnover0.93

Game Summary

Merrimack won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.