
UC Riverside
10-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.7%UC Riverside
66.3%Portland
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPortland -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL154.3
MODEL MONEYLINEPortland -197

Portland
15-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUC Riverside 75
Projected Total154.3
Projected ScorePortland 80
Team Comparison
41.2MMH Power Index42.7
103.1Offensive Efficiency104.8
110.1Defensive Efficiency110.6
-7.0Net Efficiency-5.8
0.5Strength of Schedule1.8
-5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.1
70.7Tempo71.0
49.8%Effective FG%52.0%
18.5%Turnover Rate19.3%
28.5%Offensive Rebound %28.7%
35.2%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-4.9Average Margin-4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Portland HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPortland holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.7–41.2), offensive efficiency (104.8–103.1), net efficiency (-5.8–-7.0), strength of schedule (1.8–0.5).
UC Riverside COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (110.1–110.6), recent form (-5.1–-8.1), ball security (18.5–19.3).