Long Island University

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

69.6%Long Island University

30.4%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLong Island University -5.0

PROJECTED TOTAL150.3

MODEL MONEYLINELong Island University -229

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLong Island University 78

Projected Total150.3

Projected ScorePepperdine 73

Team Comparison

Long Island UniversityMetricPepperdine

50.2MMH Power Index38.2

107.6Offensive Efficiency103.2

104.8Defensive Efficiency113.6

2.8Net Efficiency-10.4

-1.3Strength of Schedule0.7

4.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

68.5Tempo70.0

53.0%Effective FG%48.7%

18.9%Turnover Rate18.3%

33.6%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

34.9%Free Throw Rate34.0%

1.9Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Long Island University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLong Island University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–38.2), offensive efficiency (107.6–103.2), defensive efficiency (104.8–113.6), net efficiency (2.8–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-1.3), ball security (18.3–18.9).

Final

Long Island University

53—88

Pepperdine

Pepperdine by 35 • 77.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Long Island UniversityTEAM STATPepperdine

15-53FG27-67

28.0%FG%40.0%

4-153PT9-19

27.0%3PT%47.0%

19-25FT25-28

76.0%FT%89.0%

31Rebounds52

4Offensive Rebounds15

5Assists14

15Turnovers13

9Steals6

—Blocks3

22Fouls17

Player Box Score

Long Island University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
R.J. Greene	G	39	2-9	0-0	10-11	10	1	1	14
Tai Strickland	Guard	21	2-5	0-0	6-8	2	1	1	10
Terell Strickland	Guard	20	4-10	2-4	0-0	4	0	2	10
Andre Washington	G	18	4-7	2-4	0-0	0	1	3	10
Nikola Djapa	C	13	2-3	0-1	1-4	3	0	0	5
Tana Kopa	Guard	35	0-8	0-6	2-2	3	1	2	2
Eric Acker	G	30	1-4	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	2
Gezim Bajrami	Center	21	0-7	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0
CJ Delancy	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Houston Mallette	G	25	6-14	4-6	8-9	6	0	1	0	24
Nils Cooper	G	17	4-7	0-1	5-5	3	1	3	0	13
Curtis Williams	Guard	21	4-6	0-1	4-4	3	1	0	0	12
Ethan Anderson	Guard	24	4-7	2-2	1-2	2	4	0	0	11
Jalen Pitre	F	19	4-7	2-3	0-0	7	0	0	2	10
Aladji Gassama	Center	24	1-3	0-0	4-4	9	2	0	0	6
Malik Messina-Moore	G	23	1-7	1-4	3-4	2	4	0	0	6
Cord Stansberry	G	11	2-4	0-1	0-0	2	1	1	0	4
Michael Ajayi	F	23	1-11	0-1	0-0	12	1	1	0	2
John Squire	F	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Paul Jordan	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
David Mager	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.1Possessions77.1

68.7Offensive Efficiency114.1

114.1Defensive Efficiency68.7

-45.4Net Efficiency45.4

32.1%Effective FG%47.0%

40.8%True Shooting %54.8%

19.8%Turnover Rate16.6%

47.2%Free Throw Rate41.8%

28.3%3-Point Rate28.4%

0.33Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 35 points. The game played at approximately 77.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.