
Temple
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.5%Temple
50.5%Drexel
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDrexel -1.4
PROJECTED TOTAL139.6
MODEL MONEYLINEDrexel -102

Drexel
17-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTemple 69
Projected Total139.6
Projected ScoreDrexel 71
Team Comparison
50.9MMH Power Index46.5
112.2Offensive Efficiency103.6
107.4Defensive Efficiency102.4
4.8Net Efficiency1.2
-2.0Strength of Schedule-0.4
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
65.9Tempo65.7
51.1%Effective FG%51.3%
13.7%Turnover Rate19.1%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
42.3%Free Throw Rate32.3%
3.2Average Margin0.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Temple HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTemple holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.9–46.5), offensive efficiency (112.2–103.6), net efficiency (4.8–1.2), recent form (-1.5–-4.7).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–107.4), strength of schedule (-0.4–-2.0), shooting efficiency (51.3–51.1).