High Point

31-5

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

80.5%High Point

19.5%Queens University

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHigh Point -10.8

PROJECTED TOTAL170.0

MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -413

Queens University

21-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHigh Point 90

Projected Total170.0

Projected ScoreQueens University 80

Team Comparison

High PointMetricQueens University

69MMH Power Index51.7

123.8Offensive Efficiency118.4

98.3Defensive Efficiency117.0

25.5Net Efficiency1.4

-5.8Strength of Schedule0.1

16.5Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5

72.4Tempo71.4

56.6%Effective FG%56.6%

12.8%Turnover Rate14.8%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %29.6%

42.4%Free Throw Rate37.6%

18.5Average Margin0.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

High Point HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–51.7), offensive efficiency (123.8–118.4), defensive efficiency (98.3–117.0), net efficiency (25.5–1.4).

Queens University COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.1–-5.8).

Final

High Point

72—74

Queens University

Queens University by 2 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

High PointTEAM STATQueens University

29-65FG24-65

45.0%FG%37.0%

8-223PT11-28

36.0%3PT%39.0%

6-12FT15-21

50.0%FT%71.0%

50Rebounds31

17Offensive Rebounds10

8Assists13

14Turnovers5

4Steals6

11Blocks1

16Fouls16

Player Box Score

High Point

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Duke Miles	G	36	9-18	2-4	1-1	1	3	1	1	21
Kimani Hamilton	F	31	5-11	1-1	4-8	10	0	0	2	15
Trae Benham	Guard	26	3-8	2-6	0-0	3	0	0	0	8
Kezza Giffa	G	23	4-9	0-3	0-0	5	1	1	0	8
Abdoulaye Thiam	Guard	26	3-7	1-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	7
Cade Potter	Forward	22	3-7	1-3	0-1	12	2	1	2	7
Juslin Bodo Bodo	C	18	1-2	0-0	1-2	10	0	0	5	3
Bryson Childress	Guard	10	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Denzel Hines	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Titas Sargiunas	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AJ McKee	Guard	36	6-16	2-5	7-8	6	4	1	0	21
BJ McLaurin	Forward	33	5-12	4-7	4-4	4	2	0	0	18
Deyton Albury	G	34	3-13	0-1	3-7	4	1	2	0	9
Bryce Cash	Guard	24	4-10	1-5	0-0	3	0	0	0	9
Chris Ashby	G	36	2-4	2-4	0-0	4	2	1	0	6
Kobe George	Guard	10	2-4	1-1	1-2	1	3	1	0	6
Jaxon Pollard	F	10	1-4	1-4	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Jacobi Sebock	Guard	12	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Malcolm Wilson	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9

104.5Offensive Efficiency107.4

107.4Defensive Efficiency104.5

-2.9Net Efficiency2.9

50.8%Effective FG%45.4%

50.9%True Shooting %49.3%

20.7%Turnover Rate7.1%

18.5%Free Throw Rate32.3%

33.8%3-Point Rate43.1%

0.57Assist / Turnover2.60

Game Summary

Queens University won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.