
UNC Greensboro
15-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.8%UNC Greensboro
95.2%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -21.0
PROJECTED TOTAL164.3
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -1983

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNC Greensboro 72
Projected Total164.3
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 93
Team Comparison
46.7MMH Power Index68.9
112.6Offensive Efficiency120.9
115.3Defensive Efficiency105.7
-2.7Net Efficiency15.2
-1.9Strength of Schedule7.4
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
69.8Tempo70.9
52.8%Effective FG%55.3%
14.6%Turnover Rate13.5%
28.7%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
41.7%Free Throw Rate39.3%
-1.9Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–46.7), offensive efficiency (120.9–112.6), defensive efficiency (105.7–115.3), net efficiency (15.2–-2.7).
UNC Greensboro COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (41.7–39.3).