UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

11.7%UTSA

88.3%Lamar

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLamar -15.3

PROJECTED TOTAL145.3

MODEL MONEYLINELamar -755

Lamar

12-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 65

Projected Total145.3

Projected ScoreLamar 80

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricLamar

30.5MMH Power Index44.1

99.0Offensive Efficiency105.0

115.0Defensive Efficiency103.8

-16.0Net Efficiency1.2

-1.2Strength of Schedule-3.0

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2

70.2Tempo66.6

45.9%Effective FG%48.8%

17.0%Turnover Rate18.0%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %35.5%

29.9%Free Throw Rate28.5%

-11.3Average Margin0.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lamar HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLamar holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.1–30.5), offensive efficiency (105.0–99.0), defensive efficiency (103.8–115.0), net efficiency (1.2–-16.0).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-3.0), ball security (17.0–18.0), free throw rate (29.9–28.5).

Final

UTSA

82—90

Lamar

Lamar by 8 • 77.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATLamar

28-68FG28-80

41.0%FG%35.0%

8-303PT11-29

27.0%3PT%38.0%

18-26FT23-30

69.0%FT%77.0%

45Rebounds57

12Offensive Rebounds25

15Assists22

10Turnovers8

4Steals4

3Blocks8

22Fouls21

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Adante' Holiman	G	33	7-16	4-11	4-5	4	1	2	1	22
Trey Edmonds	Center	31	5-7	0-0	2-5	12	4	1	0	12
PJ Carter	G	20	4-8	1-2	3-3	1	0	0	0	12
Carlton Linguard Jr.	Center	23	4-8	0-2	2-2	7	0	0	2	10
Isaiah Wyatt	Guard	22	3-6	2-5	1-2	4	1	0	0	9
Chandler Cuthrell	F	16	2-5	1-3	3-3	1	0	1	0	8
Christian Tucker	Guard	24	2-7	0-3	2-2	4	6	0	0	6
Nazar Mahmoud	G	6	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Massal Diouf	Forward	7	0-2	0-0	1-2	0	1	0	0	1
Dre Fuller Jr.	Guard	18	0-7	0-3	0-2	8	2	0	0	0

Lamar

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Terry Anderson	Forward	28	5-13	1-4	9-11	11	8	0	2	20
Adam Hamilton	Center	24	7-13	0-0	2-5	14	1	0	3	16
B.B. Knight	G	19	6-14	4-9	0-0	2	0	0	1	16
Ja'Sean Jackson	Guard	30	2-8	2-6	6-6	2	3	1	0	12
Chris Pryor	Guard	21	3-9	3-6	2-2	3	2	2	0	11
Jakevion Buckley	G	20	3-5	1-1	3-4	2	2	1	0	10
Valentin Catt	G	10	1-2	0-0	1-2	3	2	0	0	3
Errol White	F	12	1-4	0-0	0-0	6	1	0	0	2
Cody Pennebaker	G	22	0-9	0-3	0-0	4	0	0	1	0
Brian Gordon	Guard	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Janko Bulajic	C	6	0-2	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.9Possessions77.9

105.3Offensive Efficiency115.5

115.5Defensive Efficiency105.3

-10.3Net Efficiency10.3

47.1%Effective FG%41.9%

51.0%True Shooting %47.7%

12.8%Turnover Rate10.4%

38.2%Free Throw Rate37.5%

44.1%3-Point Rate36.3%

1.50Assist / Turnover2.75

Game Summary

Lamar won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 77.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.