
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
72.0%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -6.4
PROJECTED TOTAL148.8
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -257

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 71
Projected Total148.8
Projected ScoreTCU 78
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index59.7
112.6Offensive Efficiency110.2
103.1Defensive Efficiency102.7
9.5Net Efficiency7.5
-1.9Strength of Schedule4.6
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
67.4Tempo70.2
55.7%Effective FG%50.5%
17.9%Turnover Rate15.3%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
29.6%Free Throw Rate38.3%
6.4Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
TCU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–55.8), defensive efficiency (102.7–103.1), strength of schedule (4.6–-1.9), ball security (15.3–17.9).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.6–110.2), net efficiency (9.5–7.5), recent form (12.3–2.2).