Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.1%Binghamton

80.9%Loyola Maryland

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLoyola Maryland -10.1

PROJECTED TOTAL145.7

MODEL MONEYLINELoyola Maryland -424

Loyola Maryland

12-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 68

Projected Total145.7

Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 78

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricLoyola Maryland

32.4MMH Power Index40.8

102.2Offensive Efficiency108.1

112.3Defensive Efficiency110.7

-10.1Net Efficiency-2.6

-6.0Strength of Schedule-5.0

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.1

64.2Tempo69.6

51.3%Effective FG%51.2%

18.5%Turnover Rate15.7%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %29.4%

42.8%Free Throw Rate31.0%

-6.5Average Margin-1.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Loyola Maryland HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Maryland holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (40.8–32.4), offensive efficiency (108.1–102.2), defensive efficiency (110.7–112.3), net efficiency (-2.6–-10.1).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.3–51.2), free throw rate (42.8–31.0).

Final

Binghamton

63—57

Loyola Maryland

Binghamton by 6 • 67.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATLoyola Maryland

26-60FG17-51

43.0%FG%33.0%

3-183PT5-19

17.0%3PT%26.0%

8-13FT18-24

62.0%FT%75.0%

34Rebounds38

6Offensive Rebounds9

13Assists10

8Turnovers13

5Steals5

6Blocks2

22Fouls13

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tariq Balogun	Forward	28	8-10	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	2	16
Tymu Chenery	Guard	30	4-9	1-4	5-7	3	3	0	2	14
Symir Torrence	Guard	39	5-9	0-0	2-5	8	5	2	1	12
Dan Petcash	Guard	36	4-12	1-6	0-0	8	2	0	0	9
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	19	3-7	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	6
Armon Harried	Guard	16	1-5	0-1	1-1	4	1	1	1	3
Gavin Walsh	F	14	1-2	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	3
Evan Ashe	G	14	0-3	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Chris Walker	G	4	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Loyola Maryland

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Deon Perry	Guard	29	6-19	1-6	4-5	0	1	1	0	17
Milos Ilic	C	31	3-4	0-1	6-6	4	1	0	0	12
David Brown III	Guard	35	2-5	2-3	0-0	6	2	1	0	6
D'Angelo Stines	Guard	24	2-12	2-6	0-0	4	0	1	0	6
Golden Dike	Forward	24	2-2	0-0	1-3	6	3	1	1	5
Chris Kuzemka	G	28	1-3	0-2	2-2	2	2	1	0	4
Alonso Faure	Forward	16	1-4	0-0	2-4	7	1	0	1	4
Tyson Commander	G	10	0-2	0-1	3-4	3	0	0	0	3
Samuel Gibbs	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.3Possessions67.3

93.6Offensive Efficiency84.7

84.7Defensive Efficiency93.6

8.9Net Efficiency-8.9

45.8%Effective FG%38.2%

47.6%True Shooting %45.7%

11.7%Turnover Rate19.6%

21.7%Free Throw Rate47.1%

30.0%3-Point Rate37.3%

1.63Assist / Turnover0.77

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 67.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.