
Dayton
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
53.1%Dayton
46.9%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLSU -0.4
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -113

LSU
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDayton 77
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreLSU 77
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index54.2
108.5Offensive Efficiency115.5
101.5Defensive Efficiency111.3
7.0Net Efficiency4.2
5.7Strength of Schedule4.5
6.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
68.3Tempo70.5
52.0%Effective FG%53.4%
16.9%Turnover Rate15.6%
26.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
47.6%Free Throw Rate41.9%
4.8Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Dayton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY53.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–54.2), defensive efficiency (101.5–111.3), net efficiency (7.0–4.2), strength of schedule (5.7–4.5).
LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.5–108.5), shooting efficiency (53.4–52.0), ball security (15.6–16.9).