William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

62.9%William & Mary

37.1%Omaha

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -2.8

PROJECTED TOTAL160.4

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -170

Omaha

16-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 82

Projected Total160.4

Projected ScoreOmaha 79

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricOmaha

53.8MMH Power Index44.5

112.5Offensive Efficiency110.2

105.2Defensive Efficiency110.8

7.3Net Efficiency-0.6

-1.5Strength of Schedule-2.5

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.5

73.9Tempo69.0

55.3%Effective FG%53.6%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.0%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %27.2%

45.3%Free Throw Rate34.0%

5.4Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–44.5), offensive efficiency (112.5–110.2), defensive efficiency (105.2–110.8), net efficiency (7.3–-0.6).

Omaha COUNTERS WITHball security (16.0–16.4), offensive rebounding (27.2–26.7).

Final

William & Mary

83—89

Omaha

Omaha by 6 • 72.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATOmaha

28-57FG27-61

49.0%FG%44.0%

8-253PT11-29

32.0%3PT%38.0%

19-26FT24-28

73.0%FT%86.0%

31Rebounds37

9Offensive Rebounds12

14Assists12

11Turnovers11

3Steals6

2Blocks3

22Fouls25

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Noah Collier	F	28	9-10	0-0	4-7	6	2	0	1	22
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	34	7-12	5-9	1-1	4	0	0	0	20
Sean Houpt	Guard	34	4-10	1-6	4-4	2	1	0	0	13
Chase Lowe	G	20	2-5	0-0	7-10	6	2	1	0	11
Trey Moss	G	31	4-9	1-4	1-2	3	3	1	0	10
Jack Karasinski	F	15	1-5	1-4	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	23	0-4	0-1	2-2	4	2	0	0	2
Charlie Williams	C	12	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	1	2
Jayden Lemond	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	1	0	0

Omaha

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Frankie Fidler	Forward	34	6-9	2-3	12-13	10	3	2	0	26
JJ White	G	27	4-6	2-4	0-0	1	3	1	0	10
Tony Osburn	G	20	3-7	2-5	2-2	1	2	1	0	10
Luke Jungers	F	16	3-7	3-7	1-2	5	0	0	0	10
Jaeden Marshall	G	17	2-10	1-6	4-5	2	0	0	0	9
Marquel Sutton	F	29	3-8	0-1	2-2	5	0	0	0	8
Grant Stubblefield	G	28	3-5	1-1	0-0	2	4	1	0	7
Nick Davis	Forward	16	1-5	0-0	2-2	6	0	1	2	4
Jamal Ambrose	C	6	1-2	0-1	1-2	1	0	0	0	3
Marcel Bryant	F	7	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	2

Advanced Game Stats

72.4Possessions72.4

114.6Offensive Efficiency122.9

122.9Defensive Efficiency114.6

-8.3Net Efficiency8.3

56.1%Effective FG%53.3%

59.8%True Shooting %59.9%

15.4%Turnover Rate15.0%

45.6%Free Throw Rate45.9%

43.9%3-Point Rate47.5%

1.27Assist / Turnover1.09

Game Summary

Omaha won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 72.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.