
Charleston
21-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.7%Charleston
68.3%Wyoming
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWyoming -6.0
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINEWyoming -215

Wyoming
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCharleston 73
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreWyoming 79
Team Comparison
53.8MMH Power Index56.1
109.2Offensive Efficiency113.4
106.2Defensive Efficiency107.7
3.0Net Efficiency5.7
1.9Strength of Schedule2.2
3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
69.1Tempo67.8
50.6%Effective FG%52.2%
15.4%Turnover Rate16.2%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %34.6%
42.1%Free Throw Rate36.7%
2.0Average Margin3.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wyoming HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWyoming holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–53.8), offensive efficiency (113.4–109.2), net efficiency (5.7–3.0), strength of schedule (2.2–1.9).
Charleston COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.2–107.7), recent form (3.9–1.4), ball security (15.4–16.2).