Lindenwood

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

43.7%Lindenwood

56.3%Omaha

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADOmaha -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL154.1

MODEL MONEYLINEOmaha -129

Omaha

16-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLindenwood 77

Projected Total154.1

Projected ScoreOmaha 78

Team Comparison

LindenwoodMetricOmaha

46.8MMH Power Index44.5

105.5Offensive Efficiency110.2

98.6Defensive Efficiency110.8

6.9Net Efficiency-0.6

-6.8Strength of Schedule-2.5

-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.5

73.7Tempo69.0

50.2%Effective FG%53.6%

18.3%Turnover Rate16.0%

34.0%Offensive Rebound %27.2%

37.9%Free Throw Rate34.0%

5.1Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lindenwood HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLindenwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.8–44.5), defensive efficiency (98.6–110.8), net efficiency (6.9–-0.6), recent form (-1.4–-4.5).

Omaha COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.2–105.5), strength of schedule (-2.5–-6.8), shooting efficiency (53.6–50.2).

Final

Lindenwood

72—70

Omaha

Lindenwood by 2 • 69.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LindenwoodTEAM STATOmaha

26-55FG24-56

47.0%FG%43.0%

4-143PT5-23

29.0%3PT%22.0%

16-21FT17-23

76.0%FT%74.0%

32Rebounds34

8Offensive Rebounds10

9Assists8

12Turnovers12

9Steals8

5Blocks2

19Fouls15

Player Box Score

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keenon Cole	Forward	37	6-14	1-5	6-8	8	2	2	1	19
Jaylon McDaniel	F	26	4-8	0-0	4-5	3	0	1	2	12
Isaac Ondekane	C	12	3-6	0-0	5-6	6	0	0	1	11
Darius Beane	Guard	28	5-10	0-0	0-0	1	3	1	0	10
Colin Ruffin	G	24	4-6	1-2	1-2	1	1	1	0	10
Keith Haymon II	Forward	30	2-7	1-5	0-0	6	1	1	0	5
Tommie Williams	Guard	17	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	1	1	0	3
Jeremiah Talton	F	18	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	2	1	2
Amoro Lado	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
David Ware	Forward	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Nathan Johnson Jr.	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Omaha

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Frankie Fidler	Forward	36	6-13	2-6	5-6	5	1	0	1	19
JJ White	G	23	2-6	0-2	9-13	0	2	1	0	13
Nick Davis	Forward	25	5-8	0-0	0-0	9	0	1	1	10
Marcel Bryant	F	15	4-5	0-1	1-2	1	0	1	0	9
Tony Osburn	G	26	3-9	2-7	0-0	6	0	0	0	8
Luke Jungers	F	10	2-3	1-2	0-0	2	0	2	0	5
Jaeden Marshall	G	20	1-6	0-3	2-2	5	2	2	0	4
Marquel Sutton	F	22	1-5	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	0	2
Grant Stubblefield	G	17	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Jamal Ambrose	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.0Possessions69.0

104.3Offensive Efficiency101.4

101.4Defensive Efficiency104.3

2.9Net Efficiency-2.9

50.9%Effective FG%47.3%

55.4%True Shooting %52.3%

17.4%Turnover Rate17.4%

38.2%Free Throw Rate41.1%

25.5%3-Point Rate41.1%

0.75Assist / Turnover0.67

Game Summary

Lindenwood won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 69.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.