
Quinnipiac
19-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
74.5%Quinnipiac
25.5%Army
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -6.3
PROJECTED TOTAL150.0
MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -292

Army
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 78
Projected Total150.0
Projected ScoreArmy 72
Team Comparison
51MMH Power Index36.8
106.8Offensive Efficiency104.8
102.1Defensive Efficiency112.1
4.7Net Efficiency-7.3
-2.3Strength of Schedule-3.3
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6
70.5Tempo68.9
48.9%Effective FG%49.8%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.3%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %31.0%
34.1%Free Throw Rate26.5%
3.4Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–36.8), offensive efficiency (106.8–104.8), defensive efficiency (102.1–112.1), net efficiency (4.7–-7.3).
Army COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (49.8–48.9).