
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.1%Rider
94.9%Duquesne
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuquesne -20.4
PROJECTED TOTAL147.5
MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -1861

Duquesne
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 64
Projected Total147.5
Projected ScoreDuquesne 84
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index50.7
96.3Offensive Efficiency110.6
115.3Defensive Efficiency106.2
-19.0Net Efficiency4.4
-0.9Strength of Schedule0.6
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9
65.9Tempo70.8
43.4%Effective FG%53.4%
17.1%Turnover Rate17.7%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
31.5%Free Throw Rate38.2%
-12.6Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Duquesne HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuquesne holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (110.6–96.3), defensive efficiency (106.2–115.3), net efficiency (4.4–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHball security (17.1–17.7), offensive rebounding (32.8–30.6).