Central Arkansas

22-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.3%Central Arkansas

89.7%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -14.3

PROJECTED TOTAL162.1

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -871

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCentral Arkansas 74

Projected Total162.1

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 88

Team Comparison

Central ArkansasMetricVanderbilt

54MMH Power Index68.9

113.9Offensive Efficiency120.9

105.2Defensive Efficiency105.7

8.7Net Efficiency15.2

-3.9Strength of Schedule7.4

9.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

71.0Tempo70.9

54.3%Effective FG%55.3%

15.3%Turnover Rate13.5%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

30.7%Free Throw Rate39.3%

6.1Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–54.0), offensive efficiency (120.9–113.9), net efficiency (15.2–8.7), strength of schedule (7.4–-3.9).

Central Arkansas COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.2–105.7), recent form (9.8–2.7).

Final

Central Arkansas

71—75

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 4 • 67.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Central ArkansasTEAM STATVanderbilt

28-57FG27-61

49.0%FG%44.0%

7-133PT9-30

54.0%3PT%30.0%

8-13FT12-21

62.0%FT%57.0%

37Rebounds34

10Offensive Rebounds12

11Assists9

14Turnovers9

4Steals7

1Blocks—

19Fouls12

Player Box Score

Central Arkansas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Masai Olowokere	Guard	34	4-6	1-2	2-4	3	1	0	0	11
Daniel Sofield	Guard	25	4-4	3-3	0-0	2	1	1	0	11
Javion Guy-King	G	20	4-11	0-0	3-4	5	2	1	0	11
Ubong-Abasi Etim	C	32	5-10	0-0	0-1	11	0	1	0	10
Tucker Anderson	F	23	3-8	1-3	0-0	3	1	1	0	7
Carl Daughtery Jr.	G	8	2-5	1-3	2-2	0	0	0	0	7
Elias Cato	Forward	35	2-5	0-0	1-2	8	3	0	1	5
Johannes Kirsipuu	G	7	2-4	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Ibbe Klintman	Guard	13	2-4	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	4
Caleb Carr	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Ezra Manjon	Guard	28	6-13	0-3	4-4	4	4	3	16
Colin Smith	F	32	4-9	2-6	4-5	11	1	1	14
Evan Taylor	Guard	31	5-11	3-8	1-2	3	0	1	14
Isaiah West	G	25	5-8	1-3	1-6	2	1	1	12
Jason Rivera-Torres	G	12	3-7	2-3	0-0	0	0	0	8
Paul Lewis	G	15	3-6	1-3	0-0	1	2	1	7
Malik Presley	G	9	1-2	0-0	2-4	2	0	0	4
Carter Lang	F	20	0-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0
Tasos Kamateros	Forward	17	0-3	0-3	0-0	1	1	0	0
JaQualon Roberts	F	11	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.6Possessions67.6

105.0Offensive Efficiency110.9

110.9Defensive Efficiency105.0

-5.9Net Efficiency5.9

55.3%Effective FG%51.6%

56.2%True Shooting %52.8%

20.8%Turnover Rate13.2%

22.8%Free Throw Rate34.4%

22.8%3-Point Rate49.2%

0.79Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 67.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.