
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
77.0%Oklahoma
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOklahoma -7.3
PROJECTED TOTAL155.5
MODEL MONEYLINEOklahoma -335

Oklahoma
21-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74
Projected Total155.5
Projected ScoreOklahoma 81
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index62.1
112.6Offensive Efficiency119.5
103.1Defensive Efficiency111.6
9.5Net Efficiency7.9
-1.9Strength of Schedule3.2
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
67.4Tempo69.4
55.7%Effective FG%55.1%
17.9%Turnover Rate14.4%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
29.6%Free Throw Rate36.2%
6.4Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Oklahoma HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOklahoma holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.1–55.8), offensive efficiency (119.5–112.6), strength of schedule (3.2–-1.9), ball security (14.4–17.9).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.1–111.6), net efficiency (9.5–7.9), shooting efficiency (55.7–55.1).