
Mississippi Valley State
3-30GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.0%Mississippi Valley State
99.0%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -34.9
PROJECTED TOTAL150.0
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -9900

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 58
Projected Total150.0
Projected ScoreTCU 92
Team Comparison
17.7MMH Power Index59.7
91.1Offensive Efficiency110.2
117.8Defensive Efficiency102.7
-26.7Net Efficiency7.5
-4.1Strength of Schedule4.6
-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
70.5Tempo70.2
45.8%Effective FG%50.5%
21.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
34.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
-18.8Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
TCU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY99.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–17.7), offensive efficiency (110.2–91.1), defensive efficiency (102.7–117.8), net efficiency (7.5–-26.7).