
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
75.4%UNLV
24.6%Pepperdine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -6.3
PROJECTED TOTAL157.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -307

Pepperdine
9-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 82
Projected Total157.8
Projected ScorePepperdine 76
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index38.2
111.0Offensive Efficiency103.2
109.6Defensive Efficiency113.6
1.4Net Efficiency-10.4
2.7Strength of Schedule0.7
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
71.4Tempo70.0
53.7%Effective FG%48.7%
17.2%Turnover Rate18.3%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
41.6%Free Throw Rate34.0%
1.0Average Margin-7.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–38.2), offensive efficiency (111.0–103.2), defensive efficiency (109.6–113.6), net efficiency (1.4–-10.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.1–30.8).