Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.4%Alabama A&M

75.6%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -8.4

PROJECTED TOTAL148.9

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -310

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 70

Projected Total148.9

Projected ScoreLipscomb 79

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricLipscomb

42.3MMH Power Index47.9

105.9Offensive Efficiency111.3

106.6Defensive Efficiency107.6

-0.7Net Efficiency3.7

-6.8Strength of Schedule-2.5

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

68.0Tempo68.8

49.7%Effective FG%54.8%

16.8%Turnover Rate16.0%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

45.7%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-0.5Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–42.3), offensive efficiency (111.3–105.9), net efficiency (3.7–-0.7), strength of schedule (-2.5–-6.8).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–107.6), recent form (3.3–-1.0), offensive rebounding (28.0–25.9).

Final

Alabama A&M

81—106

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 25 • 79.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATLipscomb

29-69FG36-64

42.0%FG%56.0%

6-213PT18-32

29.0%3PT%56.0%

17-27FT16-19

63.0%FT%84.0%

42Rebounds31

20Offensive Rebounds7

12Assists26

17Turnovers15

10Steals10

4Blocks7

16Fouls18

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dailin Smith	G	21	4-7	1-3	8-10	5	1	0	0	17
Dylan Mclean	Guard	13	5-11	2-6	4-5	3	0	1	1	16
EJ Williams	Center	15	4-5	0-0	1-4	3	3	1	1	9
Eric Lee	Guard	9	4-4	0-0	0-2	0	0	2	0	8
Caleb Blackwell	G	22	3-9	1-3	0-0	2	1	2	0	7
Chad Moodie	F	12	3-6	0-0	1-2	6	1	2	0	7
William Tavares	Center	11	2-3	1-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	7
Austin Harvell	Forward	12	1-1	1-1	0-0	3	2	0	1	3
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	18	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Jayland Randall	G	16	1-5	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Omari Peek	Guard	14	1-5	0-2	0-0	3	1	1	0	2
AC Bryant	G	12	0-4	0-2	1-2	5	1	1	0	1
London Riley	Guard	13	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Darius Osborne	Forward	8	0-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Joshua Hughley	Guard	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derrin Boyd	Guard	23	9-14	3-7	4-4	3	1	3	0	25
AJ McGinnis	Guard	22	7-11	6-9	0-0	2	3	0	0	20
Will Pruitt	Guard	20	5-7	0-1	4-4	2	8	2	0	14
Cody Head	G	16	3-6	3-5	2-2	2	2	1	1	11
Rylan Houck	Forward	15	3-5	0-1	2-2	3	2	0	0	8
Joe Anderson	Guard	24	3-5	1-1	0-0	2	5	2	0	7
TJ Johnson	F	19	2-4	2-3	0-0	5	0	0	1	6
Jason Montgomery	Guard	9	2-3	2-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Owen McCormack	Center	17	1-2	1-1	2-2	4	2	1	0	5
Hank Hutcheson	Forward	8	1-2	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	0	2
Grant Asman	F	6	0-1	0-0	2-4	2	1	1	1	2
Dylan Faulkner	F	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	4	0
Paxton Davidson	Guard	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Jack Ingold	Guard	4	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

79.9Possessions79.9

101.4Offensive Efficiency132.7

132.7Defensive Efficiency101.4

-31.3Net Efficiency31.3

46.4%Effective FG%70.3%

49.5%True Shooting %72.6%

21.6%Turnover Rate18.5%

39.1%Free Throw Rate29.7%

30.4%3-Point Rate50.0%

0.71Assist / Turnover1.73

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 79.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.