
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.2%Columbia
59.8%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTemple -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINETemple -149

Temple
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 73
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreTemple 75
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index50.9
112.4Offensive Efficiency112.2
105.2Defensive Efficiency107.4
7.2Net Efficiency4.8
-1.7Strength of Schedule-2.0
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
68.2Tempo65.9
54.4%Effective FG%51.1%
19.1%Turnover Rate13.7%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
28.8%Free Throw Rate42.3%
5.0Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–50.9), offensive efficiency (112.4–112.2), defensive efficiency (105.2–107.4), net efficiency (7.2–4.8).
Temple COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-1.5–-2.4), ball security (13.7–19.1), free throw rate (42.3–28.8).