
Gardner-Webb
4-29GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.8%Gardner-Webb
95.2%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -21.6
PROJECTED TOTAL154.9
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -1983

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 67
Projected Total154.9
Projected ScoreColgate 88
Team Comparison
26.6MMH Power Index48.8
96.0Offensive Efficiency111.7
120.4Defensive Efficiency109.0
-24.4Net Efficiency2.7
3.3Strength of Schedule-2.0
-18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
71.0Tempo68.4
48.8%Effective FG%54.5%
19.2%Turnover Rate14.8%
23.6%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
31.5%Free Throw Rate30.0%
-17.3Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–26.6), offensive efficiency (111.7–96.0), defensive efficiency (109.0–120.4), net efficiency (2.7–-24.4).
Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–-2.0), free throw rate (31.5–30.0).