
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.8%Queens University
58.2%Fairfield
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairfield -4.2
PROJECTED TOTAL160.4
MODEL MONEYLINEFairfield -139

Fairfield
21-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 78
Projected Total160.4
Projected ScoreFairfield 82
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index50.1
118.4Offensive Efficiency109.6
117.0Defensive Efficiency105.4
1.4Net Efficiency4.2
0.1Strength of Schedule-3.4
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
71.4Tempo67.8
56.6%Effective FG%49.1%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
37.6%Free Throw Rate28.4%
0.9Average Margin2.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–50.1), offensive efficiency (118.4–109.6), strength of schedule (0.1–-3.4), shooting efficiency (56.6–49.1).
Fairfield COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.4–117.0), net efficiency (4.2–1.4), recent form (3.3–1.5).